LOL. You're funny!
On Aug 11, 3:58 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Show me where I have not answered a question.
>
> "BLitTeR,“The Symbol” means "acknowledge the Feeling", it can be made "Common
> Knowledge".
>
> That's a complete sentence, do you not understand English? Do you have a
> question or or you just ranting against that which has stirred the 'fear' to
> a frenzy?
>
> peace & Love
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:51:34 -0700
> > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Non Medical Healing - The Non-Science of Life?
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
>
> > I have a question. At the end of many of your posts you state that you
> > would be "happy to answer any questions", yet the person you are
> > responding to has already asked you questions that you have failed to
> > answer. If you truly would be happy to answer any question, why not do
> > it in the post where you have been asked a question?
>
> > From what I have seen so far, your "sermon" is like this big,
> > beautiful refrigerator. It's got all the bells and whistles, but when
> > the door is opened there is nothing inside to chew on. You may say
> > things like "BLitTeR,“The Symbol” means acknowledge the Feeling" it
> > can be made "Common Knowledge", but until you explain what this means,
> > you are losing people to help you with your mission, not gaining
> > them.
>
> > In other words, your "Feeling" is turning people off, rather than on.
> > Why not take some time to gather your thoughts and try to explain how
> > you plan to accomplish your mission, rather than chanting the catch
> > phrases that offer very little substance to feed our hungry
> > appetites?
>
> > On Aug 10, 11:25 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I understand that point of view. And I confess that the view I presented
> > > was presented facetiously.
>
> > > Dear Chris,
>
> > > 1. What I believe about religion is personal opinion
>
> > > 2. I have stated a number of times, my idea is of a mechanical nature. It
> > > does involve "the ah ha moment fantastic connection in the head" that
> > > many people attribute to 'spiritual' in nature.
>
> > > undetermined??? BLitTeR - acknowledge the Feeling, "Teach the World a
> > > Word" That's the whole show my friend. Trying to understand how it will
> > > work would take a dedicated effort.
>
> > > 3. I believe it will establish Unity(period)
> > > define Unity? 'mankind working together for the good of all'
>
> > > Here's a little blurb that gives it some substance;
>
> > > Three Powers Unite
> > > “Common
> > > Knowledge”, the power of two or more persons with like mind.
>
> > > “The
> > > Feeling”, has propelled the great ones of history to their goals.
>
> > > “The
> > > Symbol”, unites nations and cultures.
>
> > > BLitTeR,“The Symbol”means , "acknowledge the Feeling"it can be made
> > > "Common Knowledge"
> > > I'll be happy to answer any questions.
> > > peace & Love
>
> > > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:32:16 -0400
> > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Non Medical Healing - The Non-Science of Life?
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > I disagree; noting a trend in argument type is not ad hominem, nor is
> > > your assumption. Both may be fallacies, but not of that type. I note all
> > > the time that Archytas is fond of long diatribes which strike one as
> > > pseudo-fictional. This is not an ad hominem attack. In our goal of
> > > maintaining open discourse, let's not swing so far in sensitivity that we
> > > shut down discourse entirely. Many types of discourse exist that may not
> > > be Pollyanna in nature, but they are not the blatant attacks that we ban
> > > for the purpose of purifying communication here.
>
> > > Tinker, we have spent some months dancing around your idea without ever
> > > truly hearing what it is. Are you actually capable of articulating it, or
> > > is this a niggling feeling that you have, a beginning of an idea that you
> > > have yet to actually flesh out, and that you hope to fully formulate
> > > here? I hope to see a clear and direct answer to this question, as it is
> > > a clear and direct question. I'm truly interested in knowing, given the
> > > time that you've invested in participation, without ever actually
> > > spelling it out. I think I can roughly summarize the philosophical
> > > positions of most of the long term posters on this board, who have done a
> > > fair job of stating exactly what it is that they believe. So far, this is
> > > what I gather from you (and please feel free to correct or clarify as
> > > appropriate):
>
> > > 1. You believe that religion is unnecessary or oppressive.
> > > 2. You believe that humanity can unite worldwide in some sort of
> > > spiritual fashion around an as yet undetermined symbol.
>
> > > 3. You believe that this unity will serve to replace religion in
> > > enlightenment and philosophy.
> > > ...and that's about it. Care to expound?
>
> > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Tinker tinker <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > How so?, was a question about the statement made, followed by an
> > > explanation of the question. That is what I don't understand, that's why
> > > I asked the question, can you answer it?
> > > If you would ask a question about a statement that I made, I would answer
> > > it, not through up a smoke screen as you have.
>
> > > I did confess that, "Two separate posts.", did not compute. If you cannot
> > > or don't want to help me to understand that, that's OK.
>
> > > It does not matter what you are relaying about the person, it is "about
> > > the person", not an idea of the person. Considering your confessed
> > > contempt for me it's not likely that you would be doing anything other
> > > than attacking. Sir, you are guilty of ad hominem, again.
>
> > > (and as we know the best defense is a good offense, in that vein, I am
> > > also guilty)(I apologize)
>
> > > peace & Love
>
> > > > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:41:02 -0700
> > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Non Medical Healing - The Non-Science of Life?
> > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > > Perhaps you can explain what you don't understand about it. You
> > > > simply don't comprehend and I'd like to help you if you could just let
> > > > me know what you don't understand about the statement.
>
> > > > Relaying what is typical of a person is not ad hominen.
>
> > > > On Aug 10, 7:57 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:03:41 -0700
> > > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Non Medical Healing - The Non-Science of
> > > > > > Life?
> > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > > > > Out of context Tinker.
>
> > > > > How so? It is a reference to non-medical healing which you seem to
> > > > > support in debunking the practitioner.
>
> > > > > > Very typical of you.
>
> > > > > Would that be ad hominem, sir? It does appear that you are talking
> > > > > about a person with no reference to any idea.
>
> > > > > > Two separate posts.
>
> > > > > I have no idea what you mean here :-(
>
> > > > > > Final answer, NO.
>
> > > > > Was there another question and answer that I missed? And the
> > > > > expletive NO, does not change what I see to be directly related.
>
> > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > On Aug 10, 5:19 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > "A patient's anxiety brings about a headache, the relaxation
> > > > > > > caused by simply "knowing" there is help available alleviates the
> > > > > > > headache, and the patient thinks the practitioner did a wonderful
> > > > > > > job." - Slip
>
> > > > > > > Wouldn't that apply to taking an aspirin for a headache also?
>
> > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:26:12 -0700
> > > > > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Non Medical Healing - The Non-Science
> > > > > > > > of Life?
> > > > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > > > > > > In the case of chiropractic applied kinesiology, who other than
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > practitioner can provide the care? The intent is not to send
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > patient home to perform chiropractic adjustments, self
> > > > > > > > messaging etc.
> > > > > > > > The idea of healing through motor skill is at best wishful
> > > > > > > > thinking at
> > > > > > > > this point in time. I think the mind takes the bulk of the
> > > > > > > > credit in
> > > > > > > > any situation outside medicinal application. In any placebo
> > > > > > > > study the
> > > > > > > > validity of the condition would have to be positively
> > > > > > > > ascertained
> > > > > > > > before we could attribute the change to the alternative. If
> > > > > > > > the mind
> > > > > > > > could effect change in the cure than it could effect change in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > condition, as in bringing on the condition. A patient's anxiety
> > > > > > > > brings about a headache, the relaxation caused by simply
> > > > > > > > "knowing"
> > > > > > > > there is help available alleviates the headache, and the patient
> > > > > > > > thinks the practitioner did a wonderful job. To correlate
> > > > > > > > muscle
> > > > > > > > coordination with spirit and free will in a healing format is
> > > > > > > > just as
> > > > > > > > hazy as any other spiritual healing process.
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 6:37 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Again, you seem to be expecting the practitioner to do the
> > > > > > > > > healing for
> > > > > > > > > you (as you think the aspirin will.) A good practitioner or
> > > > > > > > > doctor
> > > > > > > > > will teach you how to maintain peak health.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 11:25 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Philogirl,
> > > > > > > > > > Kinesiology is the scientific approach to analysis and
> > > > > > > > > > healing so I
> > > > > > > > > > think you might be referring to Applied Kinesiology which
> > > > > > > > > > is basically
> > > > > > > > > > a chiropractic application. There is a distinct difference.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Applied Kinesiology has recieved much criticism and is
> > > > > > > > > > considered a
> > > > > > > > > > pseudoscience. There is hardly any evidence to support the
> > > > > > > > > > practice
> > > > > > > > > > as being effective.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Studies have shown that reliance weighs heavily on the
> > > > > > > > > > practitioner
> > > > > > > > > > and
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
