On Aug 19, 1:53 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> You are correct I do see it as a universal right, we should indeed try
> to implemet ity workld wide. Ahhh but we have no world wide
> goverment, we have no governing bodies with the power to implement
> such things, besides, considering the explosion of crap that is
> happening in the States at the mere mention of the idea, how do you
> thing other contries both the goverments and the peoples would react
> to any form of forced legislation trying to implement such a system.
You just offer it for free. That is what you said you do. I bet
they don't refuse it.
> Sorry mate, you are really cluching at air with that line of
> reasoning. May as well ask why your last prez did not got into
> Somalia or Dafur on humaniterian grounds.
Good question. But it is the last THREE presidents friend who did
nothing if you have been following along, and want to include Rwanda.
The answers are not good, I will give you that.
> Besides all of that, your post is not an answer at all, I asked why
> you do not see it as a 'right', you have not even attempted to answer,
> bad form old boy!
Your "right" as you call it, also takes away other rights by force.
The notion that everbody else is actually responsible for you has
implications. I don't have time to get into it right now, but I will
try later, sorry.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
