Ah but imagine if it was your father or your wife or, God forbid, one of your children that was killed in the bombing. Imagine the pain and loss and agony of nobody paying for this horrible crime for years until finally a man is charged and eventually convicted and you and your family get some form of closure. Until now. Having that scumbag Qaddafi invovled just makes it 10 times as bad. The 'heroes welcome' was another slap to the face to family members. Who deserves the compassion here Lee? Sometimes other people's opinions baffle me.
If you think the man is innocent that's different. I know nothing about this case except what I've heard recently. Personally, if he's guilty I think he should have been executed. dj On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:14 AM, [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote: > > You know personaly this has made me shout at the TV more than I > normaly do. > > Let me see if this make logical sense, because to mind mind there > seems to be something that has been forgotten in all of the news and > upheaveal sorrounding this. > > A man that was found guilty of a crime and has serverd a good few > years imprisonment for it has been realsed on compassionant grounds, > he is not a residant of the UK, he is dying of cancer and he has been > sent home to die. > > We had a similar thing here the other week with Ronnie Biggs the great > train robber, there has not been the same level of ill will about > that, not by a longshot. > > So the conclusion I have reached is one of the severity of the crime, > and the level of or lack of commpasion that should or has been shown. > > To my mind what is missing in the news coverage is this word > compassion. I can only find therefore that all of those who feel > outraged belive that no compassion should be show. That in my mid IS > outragouse, why should any dieing mans family feel punished for the > crimes of the father? > > If it was my dad in prison, I would love to have him home to die, > easpecily if he was imprisoned in a foriegn country. > > The Scotish legal system has shown high ethical standards here, and it > upsets me, and angers me that we as a speices seem to lack a sense of > compassion, and turn instead in anger upon the very people who show > such compassion. Man it leaves a sour taste in my mouth, I feel > ashamed, truely I do. > > On 23 Aug, 00:43, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Aug 22, 2:26 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > We release a probably not guilty patsy. >> >> You used the word "probably" so it sounds like you reached some level >> of conclusion, yet later you say that there is no way we will ever >> know? Did you see every shred of evidence presented in court? I >> didn't, you might have. All I know is that somebody was responsible >> and that it appears to me that all parties reacted somewhat poorly, >> including the celebration at the airport. The "patsy" part? >> Possible, but again you seem to have reached a conclusion. >> >> > No doubt some long done >> > commercial 'deal' was involved. >> >> No doubt? I have some doubt. I can't say either way >> >> > Embarrassment over our pathetic legal >> >> > systems is avoided. >> >> Pathetic in comparison or just the whole lot of them? Why are they >> pathetic? >> >> >This was surely enough to inflict on us as a >> > public. The authorities cannot resist piling more on. All sorts of >> > ministers and legal agents used to crawling out from under rocks and >> > trading drugs for arms amongst our enemies now tell us their honour is >> > insulted as they scramble to bask in the sordid sun of moral high >> > ground. The real message is that we will never know the truth about >> > Lockerbie and that we are unpatriotic even to think them capable of >> > dreadful lies, despite history constantly revealing this is what they >> > do. I wonder if we could list the typical lies they tell? >> >> Sure, go ahead and list them if it makes you feel better or for any >> other reason, I won't mind. >> Maybe we can set up some sort of "court" in here in regards to the >> accusations of the lies and we could conduct it in your way so that it >> would not be "pathetic?" > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
