> So, let me get this straight. You have a philosophy that, in
> philosophy, absolute truths are impossible. How do you get past the
> dichotomy of having such a contradictory absoloute truth in your
> philosophy? Alternatively, if you back off from the statement and say
> that your statement above is only a relative truth, it, then,
> logically allows for absolute truths to exist and {that they could} be
> duly ignored by you. Tricky stuff, Ian. Personally, I don't think
> you've stated your whole case, here.
Heh I think Pat that if you do not belive in a creator God then Ian's
strance is going to be the best you will get.
Many of Ian's ilke may well (and justified too I believe) accuse
people like you and I of being philosophicly lazy, that we practice a
kind of philosphy of the gaps, that we do not like to work out the
hard question of the absolute and so we call it God and have done with
it. I don't think it is an acusation that we can easily defend
against, do you?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
