On 26 Sep, 01:42, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> well Chris and Orn forgetting the people who are impressed with themselves,
> other than a a starting point I personally find the thought interesting.
> One of the definitions I found for perfect years ago was "Complete Whole
> Hearted and In Balance" now this could also be used to define good. basing
> good off that definition then Yes God is Good.
> Allan
>
Surely if God is 'in balance', there must be an equal amount of evil
to balance any good. Therefore, God is equally both good and evil.
Is that 'good'? Accepting that God is 'in balance', rules out a view
that He is 'All Good', whilst the adjective could still be used to
describe that one, single attribute.
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:41 AM, ornamentalmind
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > *** chuckles ***
>
> > "Is God Good By Definition?" is copyright © 1992 by Graham Oppy. All
> > rights reserved.
> > The electronic version is copyright © 1998 by Internet Infidels with
> > the written permission of Graham Oppy. All rights reserved.
>
> > On Sep 25, 3:52 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/graham_oppy/god.html
> > > This article touches on a few points we've discussed recently. Thoughts?
>
> --
> (
> )
> I_D Allan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
