My wfie woke me up just to let me know that he had died, i muttered
good and then rolled over and went back to sleep.

Is indifferance an emotion, I wonder, or is such indifferance caused
by other emotions I wonder?

On 28 Sep, 14:30, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not talking about lust or love but of emotional depletion.  Again it's
> subjective and I could not possibly comment on your personal emotional
> levels nor that of any other so the generalization is apropos.  Most
> of what you've commented on so far has been from a personal
> perspective.  So what you are saying is that it is impossible that
> someone could be void of a certain emotion, that emotions are to a
> degree involuntary.  When Jackson died did everyone on the planet
> break down in tears or were there some who just shrugged the 'oh well'
> expression?
>
> On Sep 28, 6:29 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Slip, to me, it appears that you are more talking about lust than
> > love. And, even ‘romantic love’ is a confused term and a misnomer as I
> > see it. So, I think we are not meeting on common ground. By the way, I
> > am not saying that people are not knotted up and in a confused state
> > with their feelings and appetites, thus feeling stuff like you imply.
> > I just do not equate such quagmires with the term ‘love’.
>
> > Your hypothetical about my skepticism, while possible, more likely
> > would not only not happen but from the start I would know ‘who I was
> > with’ and there would be no confusion about a relationship and
> > associated feelings.
>
> > When I contemplate the term ‘love’, I am considering seeing the
> > ‘equal’…and, such a state can also exist in the heart omnipresently
> > too. So, perhaps our current issue is a semantic misapprehension.
>
> > So, to me, IF what, for lack of a more accurate term, ‘real’ love is
> > no longer felt, I do consider the person impaired, no matter their
> > history. In fact, IF one had defended against it, based on historical
> > experiences, this is exactly the malady.
>
> > On Sep 27, 10:31 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Before you decide to jump in?  I thought you jumped in already :-)
>
> > > I said earlier that emotions are subjective.
>
> > > Yes, given enough people all of the above can be found, I think that
> > > would be understood.
>
> > > A person who does not allow?  Never said that a person doesn't allow
> > > the emotion.  I said that the person just doesn't feel it anymore.
> > > Your crossing wires with someone who for whatever reason, possibly
> > > hurt feelings, will shun love and someone who has had numerous love
> > > relationships that either failed, disintegrated or ended by some
> > > tragedy.   This does not render the person impaired because the
> > > emotion just isn't there anymore.  I'm sure that if you met a woman
> > > that was married 13 times, who claimed she was madly in love with you,
> > > there would be some skepticism on your part as to whether she was
> > > feeling the emotion.  A person who does not allow certainly has some
> > > issues.
> > > Love, aside from having many facets, is a very complex emotion.  We
> > > really shouldn't confine it to romantic love for the sake of my
> > > assertion.  One could love a certain food for years but one day just
> > > doesn't have the taste for it anymore.  I'm sure there are other
> > > examples, be creative Orn.
>
> > > On Sep 27, 11:51 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > “… If you are implying that that experience renders a person unhealthy
> > > > I would have to disagree.” – SD
>
> > > > Well, I wasn’t exactly implying stuff, just asking what your actual
> > > > view is before I decide to jump in. Sadly, what you mean to say
> > > > remains mostly opaque to me. So, as I put my toe in and make some
> > > > statements and questions, let’s both realize that I’m not sure of what
> > > > you are meaning to say.
>
> > > > IF your above ‘that experience’ equates to not feeling love, then yes,
> > > > I would say such a state IS unhealthy. However, here the obvious issue
> > > > is that precious few people hold the same ideas about what love means!
> > > > So…we have at least a double whammy here Slip.
>
> > > > Some of the words that for me, when taken all together, produce muddy
> > > > water in your last post include: “somewhat dormant”, “in essence
> > > > nonexistent”, “void of certain emotions”, “rarely evident”, “tune it
> > > > out”, “don’t feel it anymore”, “nonexistent”. Yes, I know, it IS a
> > > > complex situation and few of the above listed notions convey the same
> > > > meaning, at least not to me. Perhaps you are implying that given
> > > > enough different people, all of the above can be found?
>
> > > > Anyway, assuming some level of understanding here, upon what basis do
> > > > you continue to assert that a person who does not allow him/herself to
> > > > feel love is in fact healthy rather than impaired?
>
> > > > On Sep 27, 6:50 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Your close but you added 'full' which changes the implication.  I'm
> > > > > suggesting that there are specific emotions that, when experienced
> > > > > over a course of time, can become somewhat dormant and in essence non
> > > > > existent.  I know that personally I may be void of certain emotions or
> > > > > at least they are rarely evident. I think that after so many
> > > > > experiences with a certain emotion people can simply tune in out,
> > > > > which is very common with love.  After getting burned enough times,
> > > > > people just don't feel it anymore.  Many people just go through the
> > > > > motions for the obvious benefits but the emotion is non existent.  If
> > > > > you are implying that that experience renders a person unhealthy I
> > > > > would have to disagree.
>
> > > > > On Sep 27, 8:26 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "... We react differently to the same stimuli at different levels of
> > > > > > maturity so emotions can change in time and in some cases become non
> > > > > > existent." - SD
>
> > > > > > Slip, are you implying that it is possible for a healthy human to
> > > > > > achieve full lack of emotions?
>
> > > > > > On Sep 27, 5:21 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I need some Kleenex, sniff sniff.  lol
>
> > > > > > > Seriously, emotions are responsive to external stimuli and a 
> > > > > > > result of
> > > > > > > the perception of that stimuli.  For this reason different people
> > > > > > > react differently to similar stimuli.  Not all people are brought 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > tears by what is perceived by some as a very sad event, therefore
> > > > > > > emotions can be subjective.  Emotions can be a release of 
> > > > > > > subconscious
> > > > > > > senses and play a role in growth.  We react differently to the 
> > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > stimuli at different levels of maturity so emotions can change in 
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > and in some cases become non existent.
>
> > > > > > > On Sep 27, 11:13 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > What role does emotion play in our everyday lives?  How does 
> > > > > > > > emotion
> > > > > > > > affect our experience and being?  These are questions addressed 
> > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > some of the finest minds of our era.
>
> > > > > > > > For Piaget, emotion is the motivating force of action emanating 
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > outside the individual in the form of sensations emitted by 
> > > > > > > > objects.
> > > > > > > > His view is rooted in the Newtonian conception of a universe 
> > > > > > > > comprised
> > > > > > > > in isolated objects requiring an emotive force to initiate a 
> > > > > > > > series of
> > > > > > > > mechanistic interactions between objects.  Piaget reduces all
> > > > > > > > conscious human experience to a cognitive formulation of these 
> > > > > > > > causal
> > > > > > > > relations.    His abstract concept of emotion as force fails to
> > > > > > > > explain the relationship between bodily feelings, emotions, and 
> > > > > > > > higher
> > > > > > > > forms of consciousness in human beings.
>
> > > > > > > > Alfred North Whitehead indicates the factors in human nature 
> > > > > > > > which go
> > > > > > > > to make up the particular emotions, arise from our apprehension 
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > these permanent features of order in the world. His concrete 
> > > > > > > > concept
> > > > > > > > of emotion gives insight into the experience of bodily feelings 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > their relationship to the growth and learning of human beings.  
> > > > > > > > He
> > > > > > > > explains the emotions are the crucial mediating factors between 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > welter of awareness of these feelings in higher organisms.  “We
> > > > > > > > perceive other things which are in the world of actualities in 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > same sense as we are.   So our emotions are directed toward 
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > things, including of course, our bodily organs . . . the world 
> > > > > > > > for me
> > > > > > > > is nothing else than how the functioning of my body present it 
> > > > > > > > for my
> > > > > > > > experience.”
>
> > > > > > > > Jean Paul Sartre sees it differently in his book, The Emotions,
> > > > > > > > Outline of a Theory.  He sees our emotion as an “abrupt drop of
> > > > > > > > consciousness into the magical.”  He believes:  “emotion is not
> > > > > > > > accidental modification of a subject which would otherwise be 
> > > > > > > > plunged
> > > > > > > > into an unchanged world.  It is easy to see that every emotional
> > > > > > > > apprehension of an object which frightens, irritates, sadness, 
> > > > > > > > etc.,
> > > > > > > > can be made only on the basis of a total alteration of the 
> > > > > > > > world.  In
> > > > > > > > order that an object may in reality appear terrible, it must 
> > > > > > > > realize
> > > > > > > > itself as an immediate and magical presence face to face with
> > > > > > > > consciousness.“  In other words, we modify our experience with 
> > > > > > > > emotion
> > > > > > > > to make it more comfortable, according to our own nature.  We 
> > > > > > > > emote
> > > > > > > > sadness, anger or gloom because “lacking the power and will to
> > > > > > > > accomplish the acts which we have been planning, we behave in 
> > > > > > > > such a
> > > > > > > > way that the universe no longer requires anything of us.”
>
> > > > > > > > What do YOU think?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to