I never proclaimed to have a solution for "how". Your exact quote was thus:
"An argument by you and perhaps even Neil for removing hypocrisy from the human race and/or even selective people would be of great interest." I will most certainly make an argument FOR removing hypocrisy from the human race: Communication is the basis of human interaction, whether verbal or in non-verbal methods. Hypocrisy is a cancer to communication, causing a lack of clarity, and undermining the value of communication by demonstrating in a non-verbal way that the information given in verbal communication is of questionable value, even to the speaker. I support the abolition of hypocrisy from the human race entirely, because I believe that this will greatly enhance the value of communication. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:12 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>wrote: > Moving my clay feet aside Chris, I continue to wait anxiously to learn > how to do away with hypocrisy. > > On Dec 2, 3:18 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > You know, Orn, my very first tangle with you was on the issue of race, > when > > I used the exact methodologies you just explained, to which you took > > offense, despite my sincere apologies. Your series of posts here in which > > you engage in both presumptive thought and projection of your own tactics > on > > to me is enlightening, although surprising, given your retort back then > that > > you would never engage in that sort of thing. Perhaps you've learned the > > value of such tactics since then? > > > > Yes, it took a right wing think tank to note the innate hypocrisy of > > Chomsky's positions. The Left venerates him far too much to admit any of > his > > faults. You still falsely assume I'm on the Right, and so put forth a > > bipartisan response...an example of your own bifurcation. At some point, > I > > genuinely hope you realize my true stance in the middle, assuming you > > understand the possibility of such a stance. > > > > Until that day, I believe we'll probably remain sparring partners, which > has > > its own benefits; I've rarely had the pleasure of engaging with someone > as > > educated and debate ready as yourself. > > > > On Dec 2, 2009 8:50 AM, "ornamentalmind" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > “… Orn seems to have a bee in the bonnet > > > > about this fella, and it sure looks very much like hero worship to me. So > it > > is indeed strange that... > > of Noam…” – Lee > > > > Yes, Lee, it would so appear. And, often I throw red meat to see how > > much will be snatched and eaten by fellow ideologues. The results have > > been predictable overall. In fact, this has happened so many times > > that I can’t count them all. My post by a radical leftie was carefully > > selected in response to the rightwing ‘think tank’ post…and the bell > > rang…and out of each corner…well, you get the picture. Overall, rather > > than blatant trolling, I do this more in the methodology of Neil’s > > nonsensical and thus experimental and professed educational postings… > > continuing to do what he used to do professionally here for free. Is > > it possible to escape mental constructs? Is it possible to assist > > others in independent thinking? I’m actually not sure. However, quite > > often I see most here, from gabbers to Molly make attempts at such > > ends. > > > > In fact, I share just as much apparent hypocrisy as any human being. > > And, as far as I can tell, such things are mostly if not all > > projections. > > > > So, quickly, back to Noam…yes, I do appreciate his way of looking at > > things. Since I started reading and studying his stuff recently, I > > have been able to break free of quite a few areas of thought based on > > ignorance and blind belief…kinda like many of the ‘sheeple’ often > > referred to who begin to wake up. In this way, I’ve found him to be of > > value…slashing through social memes and/or propaganda. They are quite > > similar. And, without meaning to be a Chomsky apologist, a handful of > > ME members seem to have had similar epiphanies from his views. If so, > > my intentions, regardless of methodology, have been successful. > > > > On Dec 2, 2:16 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > You are 100% correct > > Chris. Orn seems to have... > > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > > You received this > > > > ... > > > > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are > > > > subscribed to the Google Gro... > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
