Can we amend this bill to allow hypocrisy when teaching our kids the right way to live? 'Cause if we don't they'll all grow up to be scoundrels and whores. I'm just sayin'.
-Don On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I never proclaimed to have a solution for "how". Your exact quote was thus: > "An argument by you and perhaps even Neil for removing hypocrisy from > the human race and/or even selective people would be of great > interest." > I will most certainly make an argument FOR removing hypocrisy from the human > race: > Communication is the basis of human interaction, whether verbal or in > non-verbal methods. Hypocrisy is a cancer to communication, causing a lack > of clarity, and undermining the value of communication by demonstrating in a > non-verbal way that the information given in verbal communication is of > questionable value, even to the speaker. I support the abolition of > hypocrisy from the human race entirely, because I believe that this will > greatly enhance the value of communication. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:12 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Moving my clay feet aside Chris, I continue to wait anxiously to learn >> how to do away with hypocrisy. >> >> On Dec 2, 3:18 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: >> > You know, Orn, my very first tangle with you was on the issue of race, >> > when >> > I used the exact methodologies you just explained, to which you took >> > offense, despite my sincere apologies. Your series of posts here in >> > which >> > you engage in both presumptive thought and projection of your own >> > tactics on >> > to me is enlightening, although surprising, given your retort back then >> > that >> > you would never engage in that sort of thing. Perhaps you've learned the >> > value of such tactics since then? >> > >> > Yes, it took a right wing think tank to note the innate hypocrisy of >> > Chomsky's positions. The Left venerates him far too much to admit any of >> > his >> > faults. You still falsely assume I'm on the Right, and so put forth a >> > bipartisan response...an example of your own bifurcation. At some point, >> > I >> > genuinely hope you realize my true stance in the middle, assuming you >> > understand the possibility of such a stance. >> > >> > Until that day, I believe we'll probably remain sparring partners, which >> > has >> > its own benefits; I've rarely had the pleasure of engaging with someone >> > as >> > educated and debate ready as yourself. >> > >> > On Dec 2, 2009 8:50 AM, "ornamentalmind" <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > “… Orn seems to have a bee in the bonnet >> > >> > about this fella, and it sure looks very much like hero worship to me. >> > So it >> > is indeed strange that... >> > of Noam…” – Lee >> > >> > Yes, Lee, it would so appear. And, often I throw red meat to see how >> > much will be snatched and eaten by fellow ideologues. The results have >> > been predictable overall. In fact, this has happened so many times >> > that I can’t count them all. My post by a radical leftie was carefully >> > selected in response to the rightwing ‘think tank’ post…and the bell >> > rang…and out of each corner…well, you get the picture. Overall, rather >> > than blatant trolling, I do this more in the methodology of Neil’s >> > nonsensical and thus experimental and professed educational postings… >> > continuing to do what he used to do professionally here for free. Is >> > it possible to escape mental constructs? Is it possible to assist >> > others in independent thinking? I’m actually not sure. However, quite >> > often I see most here, from gabbers to Molly make attempts at such >> > ends. >> > >> > In fact, I share just as much apparent hypocrisy as any human being. >> > And, as far as I can tell, such things are mostly if not all >> > projections. >> > >> > So, quickly, back to Noam…yes, I do appreciate his way of looking at >> > things. Since I started reading and studying his stuff recently, I >> > have been able to break free of quite a few areas of thought based on >> > ignorance and blind belief…kinda like many of the ‘sheeple’ often >> > referred to who begin to wake up. In this way, I’ve found him to be of >> > value…slashing through social memes and/or propaganda. They are quite >> > similar. And, without meaning to be a Chomsky apologist, a handful of >> > ME members seem to have had similar epiphanies from his views. If so, >> > my intentions, regardless of methodology, have been successful. >> > >> > On Dec 2, 2:16 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > You are 100% correct >> > Chris. Orn seems to have... >> > >> > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext >> > > > > > > - >> > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > > You received this > >> > > ... >> > >> > > read more »- Hide quoted text - >> > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are >> > >> > subscribed to the Google Gro... >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
