“His response is irrelevant. Facts are facts….” – Chris

Herein lies the seed of fanaticism Chris. Again, it would be wonderful
if we lived in a black and white world…many theists have this need
too. The ‘truth’ is that we do not, at least not in the terms
currently being addressed.


On Dec 1, 9:22 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> No hypocrisy in my criticism. I say, if you have a point, stand on it, and
> live by it. I support freedom of personal choice for ingestables, and smoke.
> I support Second Amendment rights, and own firearms. I support marriage
> equality laws, and coordinate and attend my gay friends' marriage
> ceremonies. Please elaborate on your assertion that the hypocrisy of
> criticism will be exposed. Noam should practice what he preaches, period. He
> should eschew the evil capitalist system, and give his books away for free,
> not charge for lectures, personal and media appearances, and give the vast
> majority of his wealth to the poor.
>
> His response is irrelevant. Facts are facts. He has achieved a personal net
> worth in the millions by using that system he decries, and he even uses tax
> loopholes like trust funds to hide and decrease his tax liability...in other
> words, he IS one of the rich fat cats avoiding paying in to the systems
> which feed the poor that he made so much money decrying.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:13 PM, ornamentalmind 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > “…Although it is a good point well made, bloody hypocrit!  Heh then
> > again, point me out just one person who truely practices what they
> > preach 100% of the time.” - Lee
>
> > More to the specific point, when one asks a different question, like
> > what would you have Noam to do?... the hypocrisy of the criticism is
> > exposed.
>
> > On Dec 1, 6:46 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Heh quite something that huh.
>
> > > Still I can't help but think that he is only taking advantage of the
> > > schemes open to one of his wealth in order to keep it, as the rest of
> > > his ilke do I guess.  That it is incredibly hard to live a life bound
> > > by ones morality when all others in a similar situation to you take
> > > advantage of the system, and that if fair laws were intruduced and
> > > things like these tax havens simply did not exist so that a rich man
> > > paid his tax burden like the rest of us, then he would be more able to
> > > live live in an un-hypocritical way.
>
> > > Although it is a good point well made, bloody hypocrit!  Heh then
> > > again, point me out just one person who truely practices what they
> > > preach 100% of the time.
>
> > > On 1 Dec, 13:17, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Noam certainly knows something about wealth and capitalism...
>
> > > >http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/2912626.html
>
> > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:39 AM, ornamentalmind <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > An interview with Noam that includes a deeper analysis of wealth,
> > > > > distribution and government than that found on corporate news:
>
> > > > >http://anarchismtoday.org/News/article/sid=74.html
>
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > “I’m concerned that students not become passive acceptors of the
> > > > > official doctrine that’s handed down to them from the White House,
> > the
> > > > > media, textbooks, teachers and preachers” – Howard Zinn
>
> > > > > On Nov 30, 7:47 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Brilliant Don!   I concur, ditto.
>
> > > > > > On Nov 30, 3:48 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > More wealth redistribution ideologuery.  If the man knew about
> > feeding
> > > > > > > the needy he wouldn't spout such non-sense.  Meals on Wheels has
> > > > > > > nothing to do with Social Security.  Community service, by
> > definition,
> > > > > > > is local and supported by local businesses and private donors.
> >  SS is
> > > > > > > nothing but an enormous Ponzi scheme that soon will fail unless
> > > > > > > massive amounts of money are pumped into it.  It is consumed by
> > fraud
> > > > > > > and waste.  This is what happens to enormous federal entities.
> > > > > > > Proponents of single payer HC should sit up and take notice.
>
> > > > > > > Community service isn't subversive it is being phased out by the
> > > > > > > federal government.  Our earnings are increasingly being
> > confiscated
> > > > > > > and we have less to help our local citizens out.  The money is
> > being
> > > > > > > used to fund politicians pet projects and as bribes to get new
> > > > > > > colossal spending bills passed.  See the New Louisiana Purchase.
> >  Mr.
> > > > > > > Chomsky has it backwards and I think he probably knows it.
>
> > > > > > > -Don
>
> > > > > > > n Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, ornamentalmind
>
> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Other than the obvious irony, how would you criticize this
> > recent
> > > > > > > > quote by Noam?
>
> > > > > > > > "Social Security is based on an extremely dangerous principle:
> > that
> > > > > > > > you should care whether the disabled widow across town has food
> > to
> > > > > > > > eat. The Social Security "reformers" would rather have you
> > > > > concentrate
> > > > > > > > on maximizing your own consumption of goods and subordinating
> > > > > yourself
> > > > > > > > to power. That's life. Caring for other people, and taking
> > community
> > > > > > > > responsibility for things like health and retirement — that's
> > just
> > > > > > > > deeply subversive." – Noam Chomsky
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.zcommunications.org/zquotes/2600
>
> > > > > > > > --
>
> > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­­.com>
> > > > > .
> > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > > > > groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > --
>
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­­.com>
> > > > > .
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to