Actually, Pat, it's a satirical piece. Sorry about your lack of access. The premise of the piece is that they found God, but he was dead, thereby proving both his existence, and that Nietzche was right. :^D
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 28 Jan, 23:52, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8 > > > > Shall we discuss? > > > I'd love to, but I can't see the link due to my accesses. Although as > I don't even state that my theory is 'proof', I can't see how the "God > is Dead" concept can be proven. First, you'd have to prove that God > was, at some point alive, and then died. This means that the proof > would have to both prove the existence OF God and THEN follow that > with proof that such an entity died. It doesn't seem to very logical > in my opinion. Especially if the God they proved first existed was > omnipoten, yet couldn't prevent their own death. ;-) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
