Harrumph. I'm going back to dj. dj
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:03 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I see the footballer (John Terry) has be blown out by the judge as > freedom of speech is more important than privacy. Don will soon be > sleeping with the fishes or blown out in the News of the Screws, > perhaps both if he is intimate with fish. See what you get for dissin > god mate? > > On 29 Jan, 17:38, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: >> ;-)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iHDy95NPhc >> >> On 29 Jan., 18:32, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On 29 Jan, 15:32, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > Don? What next, you'll call out someone else's name whilst intimate? >> >> > Perhaps he means it in the Mafioso title of respect way? ;-) >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > He also turned out to be small Pat. There's a lovely bit with a vicar >> > > > saying 'there's good news and bad news' over the find. Lighten up >> > > > mate, one must tolerate the children in their games. Good find Don. >> >> > > > On 29 Jan, 14:12, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > Actually, Pat, it's a satirical piece. Sorry about your lack of >> > > > > access. >> > > > The >> > > > > premise of the piece is that they found God, but he was dead, thereby >> > > > > proving both his existence, and that Nietzche was right. :^D >> >> > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Pat <[email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > > On 28 Jan, 23:52, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8 >> >> > > > > > > Shall we discuss? >> >> > > > > > I'd love to, but I can't see the link due to my accesses. >> > > > > > Although as >> > > > > > I don't even state that my theory is 'proof', I can't see how the >> > > > > > "God >> > > > > > is Dead" concept can be proven. First, you'd have to prove that >> > > > > > God >> > > > > > was, at some point alive, and then died. This means that the proof >> > > > > > would have to both prove the existence OF God and THEN follow that >> > > > > > with proof that such an entity died. It doesn't seem to very >> > > > > > logical >> > > > > > in my opinion. Especially if the God they proved first existed was >> > > > > > omnipoten, yet couldn't prevent their own death. ;-) >> >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > > Groups >> > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. >> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups >> > > > > > .com> >> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com> >> > > > > > . >> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > > Groups >> > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. >> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups >> > > > .com> >> > > > . >> > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text - >> >> > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
