I see the footballer (John Terry) has be blown out by the judge as freedom of speech is more important than privacy. Don will soon be sleeping with the fishes or blown out in the News of the Screws, perhaps both if he is intimate with fish. See what you get for dissin god mate?
On 29 Jan, 17:38, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > ;-)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iHDy95NPhc > > On 29 Jan., 18:32, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 29 Jan, 15:32, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Don? What next, you'll call out someone else's name whilst intimate? > > > Perhaps he means it in the Mafioso title of respect way? ;-) > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > He also turned out to be small Pat. There's a lovely bit with a vicar > > > > saying 'there's good news and bad news' over the find. Lighten up > > > > mate, one must tolerate the children in their games. Good find Don. > > > > > On 29 Jan, 14:12, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Actually, Pat, it's a satirical piece. Sorry about your lack of > > > > > access. > > > > The > > > > > premise of the piece is that they found God, but he was dead, thereby > > > > > proving both his existence, and that Nietzche was right. :^D > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Pat <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 28 Jan, 23:52, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8 > > > > > > > > Shall we discuss? > > > > > > > I'd love to, but I can't see the link due to my accesses. Although > > > > > > as > > > > > > I don't even state that my theory is 'proof', I can't see how the > > > > > > "God > > > > > > is Dead" concept can be proven. First, you'd have to prove that God > > > > > > was, at some point alive, and then died. This means that the proof > > > > > > would have to both prove the existence OF God and THEN follow that > > > > > > with proof that such an entity died. It doesn't seem to very > > > > > > logical > > > > > > in my opinion. Especially if the God they proved first existed was > > > > > > omnipoten, yet couldn't prevent their own death. ;-) > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > > > > > .com> > > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com> > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > > > .com> > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
