;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iHDy95NPhc

On 29 Jan., 18:32, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 Jan, 15:32, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Don? What next, you'll call out someone else's name whilst intimate?
>
> Perhaps he means it in the Mafioso title of respect way?  ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > He also turned out to be small Pat.  There's a lovely bit with a vicar
> > > saying 'there's good news and bad news' over the find.  Lighten up
> > > mate, one must tolerate the children in their games.  Good find Don.
>
> > > On 29 Jan, 14:12, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Actually, Pat, it's a satirical piece. Sorry about your lack of access.
> > > The
> > > > premise of the piece is that they found God, but he was dead, thereby
> > > > proving both his existence, and that Nietzche was right. :^D
>
> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Pat <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On 28 Jan, 23:52, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8
>
> > > > > > Shall we discuss?
>
> > > > > I'd love to, but I can't see the link due to my accesses.  Although as
> > > > > I don't even state that my theory is 'proof', I can't see how the "God
> > > > > is Dead" concept can be proven.  First, you'd have to prove that God
> > > > > was, at some point alive, and then died.  This means that the proof
> > > > > would have to both prove the existence OF God and THEN follow that
> > > > > with proof that such an entity died.  It doesn't seem to very logical
> > > > > in my opinion.  Especially if the God they proved first existed was
> > > > > omnipoten, yet couldn't prevent their own death.  ;-)
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups
> > > > >  ­.com>
> > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > > .
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups
> > >  ­.com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to