Grazzi! On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Pat <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On 29 Jan, 15:32, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Don? What next, you'll call out someone else's name whilst intimate? > > > > Perhaps he means it in the Mafioso title of respect way? ;-) > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > He also turned out to be small Pat. There's a lovely bit with a vicar > > > saying 'there's good news and bad news' over the find. Lighten up > > > mate, one must tolerate the children in their games. Good find Don. > > > > > On 29 Jan, 14:12, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Actually, Pat, it's a satirical piece. Sorry about your lack of > access. > > > The > > > > premise of the piece is that they found God, but he was dead, thereby > > > > proving both his existence, and that Nietzche was right. :^D > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Pat <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 28 Jan, 23:52, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8 > > > > > > > > Shall we discuss? > > > > > > > I'd love to, but I can't see the link due to my accesses. Although > as > > > > > I don't even state that my theory is 'proof', I can't see how the > "God > > > > > is Dead" concept can be proven. First, you'd have to prove that > God > > > > > was, at some point alive, and then died. This means that the proof > > > > > would have to both prove the existence OF God and THEN follow that > > > > > with proof that such an entity died. It doesn't seem to very > logical > > > > > in my opinion. Especially if the God they proved first existed was > > > > > omnipoten, yet couldn't prevent their own death. ;-) > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com> > > > > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
