On 16 Feb, 18:47, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
> As far as this world is concerned the illusion of free will makes us
> accountable to society because we can speculate and give direction to
> our actions , but God cannot hold us responsible as he sees through
> the illusion or you may say he has created the illusion.
>We feel free
> and accountable but God knows for certain that we are just puppets in
> his hands ,so after death all of us find peace whether we be saints or
> sinners. Whatever retribution for our actions we get it is in this
> world and not in the next.
>

He can hold us responsible because he knows we cannot avoid the
illusion.  The ball is back in OUR court.

> On Feb 16, 4:46 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 13 Feb, 08:29, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > If your theory of total bondage is to be believed human beings will be
> > > reduced to automatons and as such , at least in the eyes of  God,  to
> > > be free from any responsibility for their actions ,whether good or
> > > evil. As such fate of all after death would be the same because how
> > > can God hold anyone accountable for his actions when whatever he did
> > > was in complete bondage to God's will. Saint and sinner will meet the
> > > same fate after death.
>
> > Nope.  The illusion of free will is what makes us responsible.  If we
> > could see into the future, you would be correct; but we cannot.  If we
> > had no ability to speculate in the present ABOUT the future, you would
> > be correct; but we can.  These two points put the responsibility back
> > on us because we do not know the outcome of our actions.  Therefore
> > God can hold us responsible, even though we will act in perfect
> > accordance with His will.  I admit that it's tricky to get one's head
> > around, but it works and it is valid.  A sinner, so to speak, doesn't
> > know that he will always sin; rather, having no access to the future,
> > believes that he MAY change.  That appearance of possible change
> > places the responsibility back onto the sinner TO change.  And, if he
> > does, he may become a saint. Whereas, in God's eyes, if he DID change
> > his ways, he was destined to be a saint all along.
>
> > > On Feb 12, 8:14 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 10 Feb, 21:09, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > All I'll say is "what ever you do is what is in the space-time
> > > > > continuum".  And, as the space-time continuum contains all of space
> > > > > and time, those events have ALWAYS been there and will ALWAYS remain
> > > > > there.  'What you imagine your choices are' are just spatio-temporal
> > > > > events that exist in the continuum. >Pat
>
> > > > > Really Pat, the Space-time Continuum has hardly been portrayed by the
> > > > > scientific community as containing all elements of time, that
> > > > > essentially and for this instance, being a containment of events past
> > > > > and future within the time portal.  
>
> > > > Not generally, no, because of how people react TO that.  But look back
> > > > at a few of Einstein's quotes like: Free Will is not compatible with
> > > > space-time.  He understood it but realised it wasn't a kettle of fish
> > > > HE wan'ted to open.  Minkowski knew it too.  But, because of the
> > > > radical changes it makes to the meaning of our lives, these people
> > > > 'chose' to avoid that aspect of it and focus on physical things that
> > > > DIDN'T open moral ketles of fish.
>
> > > > By definition a continuum contains all the point of whatever it
> > > > contains.  Therefore, if the continuum is a space-time continuum, it
> > > > MUST contain all the spatio-temporal events that have occurred/are
> > > > occurring/will occur.
>
> > > > >The non-spatial aspect of the time
> > > > > dimension alone requires alternate mathematical equation, separate and
> > > > > independent, in order to even begin evaluating it as having the
> > > > > capability of containing incidents with 3d spatial qualities in some
> > > > > chronological sequence.  The temporal dimension may indicate a "when"
> > > > > an occurrence may take place without defining the occurrence.  
>
> > > > But the temporal and spatial dimensions are NOT separate.  Therefore
> > > > one cannot separate them like that.  They are stiched together for all
> > > > time throughout all space.  And that would include the entire
> > > > continuum of Big Bang-to-ultimate destruction-to-next Big Ban
> > > > sequence.  The entire sequence of Big Bang sequences is contained in
> > > > the space-time continuum.
>
> > > > >But I
> > > > > do think that more inquiry should be directed towards whether the
> > > > > human mind, human imagination and human will is interdependent upon
> > > > > any sequence in the temporal dimension of the space-time continuum.
> > > > > Perhaps that is where distinction takes place, the departure of the
> > > > > sentient experience from that of ordinary events confined to the
> > > > > temporal dimension.  This could be exemplified by the continuity of
> > > > > planetary systems and orbital sequences within the universe. We can
> > > > > calculate a solar eclipse or what time the sun will rise at any given
> > > > > global coordinate but cannot indicate any future event concerning the
> > > > > human experience ie; longevity and demise. So the attempt to establish
> > > > > a connection between human events based on theoretical speculations is
> > > > > at best speculative in and of itself.
>
> > > > Mostly, we can't calculate human events because the REAL events are
> > > > quantum events.  If we knew, for example, that there was a large
> > > > asteroid headed for the Moon that would destroy it tomorrow, our
> > > > 'calculations' for the next solar Eclipse would NOT have taken that
> > > > into account.  Therefore, even those occultations are 'presuming' that
> > > > any unforeseen circumstances won't upset the system.  They might and,
> > > > as they are unforeseen, we won't know until it's too late.
>
> > > > > Now of course you should re-examine religious concepts that allow for
> > > > > huge "IFs" such as destinations to heavenly locales based upon moral
> > > > > behavioral choices when you are presenting "destiny" in the form of
> > > > > pre-destined human experiences contained in the space-time continuum.
> > > > > This is one of the main flaws in your presentation that leaves me
> > > > > doubtful.
>
> > > > The Qur'an is qute clear that Allah guides whom He will and 'leaves
> > > > astray' whom He will.  This pretty well sums up that some people,
> > > > whether they like it or not ARE damned from birth.  But, because we
> > > > have no access to the future, we don't know, ourselves, who those
> > > > people are and could, change our thinking to avoid it.  Whilst we
> > > > would be, in reality, only fulfilling our destiny from God's
> > > > perspective, from OUR perspective, we would 'think' we have altered
> > > > our way of life in such a way as to preserve our souls.
> > > > Remember that the key facts that give us the illusion of free will
> > > > are:
> > > >   1) We have no access to the future
> > > >   2) We can speculate before we act
>
> > > > Change either of those two, and the illusion will disappear.
>
> > > > > On Feb 10, 6:20 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 10 Feb, 02:14, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Prescribed "Destiny" cannot be possible because I can choose 
> > > > > > > tomorrow
> > > > > > > to stay in bed everyday until my destiny is forced upon me.  
> > > > > > > Choice is
> > > > > > > not destiny.  Please don't try to tell me that then my destiny 
> > > > > > > will be
> > > > > > > to remain in bed everyday 24/7 because that is not going to fly.
>
> > > > > > All I'll say is "what ever you do is what is in the space-time
> > > > > > continuum".  And, as the space-time continuum contains all of space
> > > > > > and time, those events have ALWAYS been there and will ALWAYS remain
> > > > > > there.  'What you imagine your choices are' are just spatio-temporal
> > > > > > events that exist in the continuum.
>
> > > > > > > The real issue with world hunger/poverty is that it "IS" curable.
> > > > > > > There are simple solutions to world hunger/poverty but humanity is
> > > > > > > just not doing anything about it.  There are simple solutions to
> > > > > > > homelessness but humanity is not doing anything about it.
>
> > > > > > Yup.  Agreed.  Sad, though, isn't it?
>
> > > > > > > What humanity "IS" doing is foreclosing on homes and farms, paying
> > > > > > > farmers not to grow crops as a means of controlling stock figures 
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > numerous other blockage devices designed to encourage quagmires.
>
> > > > > > > What humanity "IS" doing is setting up systems of government and
> > > > > > > financial institutions that create "Mega Wealth" and "Wars" to 
> > > > > > > gain
> > > > > > > wealth and it "IS" being accomplished without any problem.
> > > > > > > Mega wealth>No Problem  War>No Problem  Hunger>Problem
> > > > > > > Homelessness>Problem  Poverty>Problem
>
> > > > > > > Then you have the sheep that are freezing in the cold while their 
> > > > > > > wool
> > > > > > > is constantly being fleeced.  They don't understand why they are
> > > > > > > always in the cold when they have so much wool.   They look and 
> > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > the fleecers living warm and cozy with their wool and see piles of
> > > > > > > wool not being used but sold to other fleecers.  The sheep get 
> > > > > > > tired
> > > > > > > of being cold so they start to get back their wool but the prices 
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > really high and some sheep can't afford to buy any, so they must
> > > > > > > remain cold, some are so cold that they freeze to death.  Some of 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > sheep protest but many of them are jailed, assassinated and turned
> > > > > > > into mutton soup.
> > > > > > > One of the sheep named Shep tells the other sheep that the reason 
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > are cold is because they were born as bad sheep and must pray to
> > > > > > > BahBah the great sheep deity.  Shep teaches the sheep how to pray 
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > tells the sheep they need to keep him warm so that he can keep
> > > > > > > teaching them about BahBah.  The sheep gather whatever wool they 
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > glean from the fields and barns and keep Shep warm.  Thousands of
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to