"I personally wonder why people keep trying to define God" - because
the communion is sublime!

On May 27, 4:04 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> I personally wonder why people keep trying to define God
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, DarkwaterBlight
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > It is my understanding that God exists before anything existed and
> > therefore cannot be merely energy, the universe or the cosmos. These
> > are all things that could be explained by their physical properties,
> > however exhaustive! God has all of these properties and more as He is
> > also ethreal.
>
> Dark is right,  my question keeps coming back to why people keep wanting to
> separate God from the Universe. it simply can not be done because God simple
> created the entire universe from himself. Therefore it is truly logical that
> he is greater than the totality of what he created.
>
> Over the centuries people have only pretended to know him. All the theisms
> really don't matter. A person is judged by themselves from how they have
> responded to this world, not the theism they follow. In the end of they will
> find the world of their own creation..
>
> For me to know that God exist is really enough. Why he chooses to love me is
> beyond me because I really am not that lovable. To understand him is far
> beyond my ability. Past experience or interaction with my creator has lead
> to some measure of understand of what happened to others and their
> experiences.
>
> All paths that help a person to keep from separating themselves from their
> creator are good, that is the simple objective return to being that created
> them.
> Allan
>
>
>
> > I am afraid that Pat may fall short in explaining God
> > but I look forward to reading his attempt. God is, IMHO, unexplainable
> > my the mere devises of humans, even with all of their wonderful new
> > technologies and theories. The added dimensions to Pat's theory may
> > help us understand God better and more thoroughly explain the
> > afforementioned but God's folly is greater than all of human wisdom
> > combined.
>
> > On May 25, 5:33 pm, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It make sense to me, because I believe that everyone of us believes
> > > and sees things in a different way, and therefore, if you do not see
> > > God or religious beliefs like me it is ok.
> > > Now, if I say that God might not be an old wise man as most of us have
> > > been thought to believe; but he/it could be something else, what would
> > > you say to that?
> > > In second place to my statement, if God is not the old wise man, then,
> > > what is God?
> > > Could God be the energy or the cosmos of the universe?
> > > My regards
> > > Manfraco
>
> > > On May 23, 9:27 am, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Manfranco, I don't mind at all, besides I think you were here first. :)
> > > > There seemed to be some similarity between FSM and Cthulhu (the
> > octopus).
>
> > > > Before answering your questions directly I would like to give you an
> > > > idea what I think of 'beliefs', as there could be many kinds or we
> > could
> > > > have two very different ideas of what they are. I have personal
> > > > experiences that inform beliefs that I don't have words for, and the
> > > > ones that do I usually seek to make an accord with reality in a more
> > > > universal sense. So I allow a long leash for my 'romantic' side, and
> > the
> > > > analytical looks more like a meta-battlefield.
>
> > > > Belief in absolutes is incomprehensible to me, I can no longer
> > associate
> > > > any sane expression to that. I am trying to make peace with the world
> > of
> > > > potentials I've found myself in, and my association with it. This is
> > all
> > > > difficult to describe, as I've been losing the distinction between
> > > > belief and disbelief. Many of the symbols and ideas in the world have
> > > > been stepping stones for me. I am speechless when confronted with this
> > > > question, not being evasive, there are no convenient answers at my
> > > > disposal but I can assure you somehow I manage to believe in many
> > things
> > > > both great and small.
>
> > > > I could conceive of a cosmos wherein the FSM and any arbitrary
> > > > combination of other beliefs also reside. I consider it all 'narratives
> > > > of truth' at this time. If it makes sense to you, that makes one of us.
> > :)
>
> > > > On 5/20/2010 6:26 PM, Manfraco Frank Elder wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi Ash! Your link is very colourful and fun, but it seems to me a
> > > > > direct attack to God and all religious beliefs; are you sure you are
> > > > > on the right tracks? Anyhow, I hope you don't mind my coming in these
> > > > > discussions, as I would like to ask you a question about beliefs; Do
> > > > > you believe in any god? And if you don't why? As I am under the
> > > > > impression that you don't believe in anything; Am I right?
> > > > > Greetings
> > > > > Manfraco
>
> > > > > On May 19, 10:12 am, Ash<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
> > > > >> 'Obey your noodley master' -
> >http://www.venganza.org/materials/#flyers
>
> > > > >> That was Lovecraft right?
>
> > > > >> On 5/18/2010 7:37 PM, Chris Jenkins wrote:
>
> > > > >>> /Ia Ia/! Yog Sothoth
>
> > > > >>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ash<[email protected]
> > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>
> > > > >>>      Please forgive our ignorance Gabby.>:)
>
> > > > >>>      FF may be referring to the belligerent Demiurge (Yaldabaoth?)
> > > > >>>      presiding over this universe, and it's acolytes. Purely
> > speculative.
>
> > > > >>>      On 5/18/2010 1:18 PM, gabbydott wrote:
>
> > > > >>>          Pat is mistaking himself for God, but he's not the only
> > one here,
> > > > >>>          which makes them bearable.
>
> > > > >>>          On 18 Mai, 16:16, DarkwaterBlight<
> > [email protected]
> > > > >>>          <mailto:[email protected]>>    wrote:
>
> > > > >>>              I must be missing something here FF... Who's the
> > > > >>>              determinist conmen
> > > > >>>              that "we" are mistaking? I also have no feeling that
> > God's
> > > > >>>              understanding is anything less than infinite. The
> > illusion
> > > > >>>              that the so
> > > > >>>              called "haves" have created, has been a veil of
> > > > >>>              perception. I think I
> > > > >>>              can agree on that point provided I am understanding
> > you
> > > > >>>              correctly.
> > > > >>>              Would you care to continue in your discourse and
> > elaborate?
>
> > > > >>>              On May 16, 10:18 pm, Fiercely Free<[email protected]
> > > > >>>              <mailto:[email protected]>>    wrote:
>
> > > > >>>                  Pat,
> > > > >>>                       God's understanding is infinite. There's no
> > doubt
> > > > >>>                  about that.
> > > > >>>                  When we mistake some determinist conmen for
> > omnipotent
> > > > >>>                  entity, we get
> > > > >>>                  the feeling that God's understanding is not
> > infinite.
> > > > >>>                  This ignorance
> > > > >>>                  gives rise to illusion which, in turn, prompts us
> > to
> > > > >>>                  assume that
> > > > >>>                  opinion of "haves" represents the entire cosmic
> > > > >>>                  awareness...
>
> > > > >>>                  On May 7, 8:09 pm, Pat<
> > [email protected]
> > > > >>>                  <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >  wrote:
>
> > > > >>>                      On 7 May, 15:53, RP<[email protected]
> > > > >>>                      <mailto:[email protected]>>    wrote:
>
> > > > >>>                          God is the mind which concieves the
> > universe ,
> > > > >>>                          He is the mind which
> > > > >>>                          runs it, and He is the mind which destroys
> > it.
> > > > >>>                          He does not see in the
> > > > >>>                          manner in which we see each other and He
> > does
> > > > >>>                          not act in the manner in
> > > > >>>                          which we act. His awareness and action is
> > > > >>>                          transcendental in nature. In
> > > > >>>                          our vanity we may pretend to comprehend
> > Him,
> > > > >>>                          but we do not see or
> > > > >>>                          accept the fact that our intelligence is
> > not
> > > > >>>                          infinite but only a few
> > > > >>>                          grades above that of animals. We have to
> > just
> > > > >>>                          look at animals to
> > > > >>>                          realise that , after all our understanding
> > > > >>>                          also is finite. We are
> > > > >>>                          learning and growing day by day , but we
> > are
> > > > >>>                          far from being Supreme.
>
> > > > >>>                      Well, He does see as we do, but He also sees
> > in a
> > > > >>>                      way we do not.  When
> > > > >>>                      you look at something, in reality, it is Him
> > that
> > > > >>>                      is seeing (and
> > > > >>>                      hearing and every other sensation any of us
> > > > >>>                      sense).  And His ability
> > > > >>>                      to multiprocess all our awarenesses (and the
> > > > >>>                      awareness of all living
> > > > >>>                      things!) is a part of what defines His
> > > > >>>                      transcendant abilities.  But
> > > > >>>                      there are more (unseen) places than just this
> > 4-D
> > > > >>>                      universe and His
> > > > >>>                      wareness includes all that, as well.  You're
> > also
> > > > >>>                      right about our
> > > > >>>                      level of consciousness being not that much
> > above
> > > > >>>                      other animals.  It is
> > > > >>>                      our conceit that leads us to believe we are
> > far
> > > > >>>                      greater than they
> > > > >>>                      are.  But we're not.  God can think like a
> > tree
> > > > >>>                      (and, in fact thinks
> > > > >>>                      like each tree, as
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to