Actually, it might be a matter of perspective. There are perspectives in which there is good and bad. And there are ( longer time - scale + larger space - scale ) perspectives in which they get subsumed into another term or effect.
The perspectives are ours ! I see them along an evolution scale ... less evolved, more evolved. On Jun 19, 1:38 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a lot of discusions about good and bad.. and right and > wrong...and wat is moral or immoral..but wat i was wondering was .. is > it really posible to put people into the category of good people and > bad people...which are the most primary and significant roles played > by him/her(how he/she plays it) decide his being a moral or immoral > person.... i will give the most common examples.. A man may be a > philanthropist.. an animal lover.. dutiful citizen..but he is a cruel > husband and father....likewise...a man may be an outlaw.. but he is an > exellent father... i know there are many variables to consider and wat > is moral to each person varies..I'd just like your opinions
