On 21 June, 13:03, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > We all judge, everyday, I wouldn't beat yourself up about it. >
Indeed. A very 'modern Sadducean' cohen (Jewish priest by right of birth) had pointed out to me a few years back that it was nigh on impossible to "judge not", as we have to make certain judgement calls every day. I think the point to avoid is to not state that someone else (or ourselves!) is 'damned', for example, when in fact, they (or we!) may just be on a particulary difficult part of a learning curve and having a bad day. > On 20 June, 21:34, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > you know..you are right about ambivalence..i am still struggling to get of > > the silly childish judgements.. someone is agreeable .. they are good...you > > dislike someones actions or they are hard on you they are bad...then in > > perspective you think you are wrong in judging them...its hard to keep a > > clear mind in anger... its so absurd...obviously we would be better off not > > judging at all..and see people as they are...but acceptance is harder in > > practise..i am speakig of different relationships... > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 6:11 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Virtue is its own reward...though it may take a long time to > > > experience its impact. Children, of course, have little or no control > > > on their circumstances and must adapt to survive- this tactic may > > > follow one through various adult experiences- so one may have an idea > > > of what makes a "good" role/rule to follow when fitting into the > > > whatevers of life. Much is misunderstood so we wind up with the wrong > > > group, the wrong mate, the wrong career, etc. Much of life is > > > situational- including relationships- but we can get stuck- even > > > within ourselves and our own self-image vs. reality. Another problem > > > is the discomfort with ambivalence- it can get to be a teeter-totter > > > and lead to paralysis of sorts. One may have to live with myths/lies > > > for a long time before honesty is dared- and honesty takes a great > > > deal of courage and maturity. In the long run we hopefully judge > > > ourselves and others with mercy, understanding- and humor doesn't hurt > > > either! :-) > > > > On Jun 18, 3:38 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There are a lot of discusions about good and bad.. and right and > > > > wrong...and wat is moral or immoral..but wat i was wondering was .. is > > > > it really posible to put people into the category of good people and > > > > bad people...which are the most primary and significant roles played > > > > by him/her(how he/she plays it) decide his being a moral or immoral > > > > person.... i will give the most common examples.. A man may be a > > > > philanthropist.. an animal lover.. dutiful citizen..but he is a cruel > > > > husband and father....likewise...a man may be an outlaw.. but he is an > > > > exellent father... i know there are many variables to consider and wat > > > > is moral to each person varies..I'd just like your opinions > > > -- > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
