Virtue is its own reward...though it may take a long time to experience its impact. Children, of course, have little or no control on their circumstances and must adapt to survive- this tactic may follow one through various adult experiences- so one may have an idea of what makes a "good" role/rule to follow when fitting into the whatevers of life. Much is misunderstood so we wind up with the wrong group, the wrong mate, the wrong career, etc. Much of life is situational- including relationships- but we can get stuck- even within ourselves and our own self-image vs. reality. Another problem is the discomfort with ambivalence- it can get to be a teeter-totter and lead to paralysis of sorts. One may have to live with myths/lies for a long time before honesty is dared- and honesty takes a great deal of courage and maturity. In the long run we hopefully judge ourselves and others with mercy, understanding- and humor doesn't hurt either! :-)
On Jun 18, 3:38 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a lot of discusions about good and bad.. and right and > wrong...and wat is moral or immoral..but wat i was wondering was .. is > it really posible to put people into the category of good people and > bad people...which are the most primary and significant roles played > by him/her(how he/she plays it) decide his being a moral or immoral > person.... i will give the most common examples.. A man may be a > philanthropist.. an animal lover.. dutiful citizen..but he is a cruel > husband and father....likewise...a man may be an outlaw.. but he is an > exellent father... i know there are many variables to consider and wat > is moral to each person varies..I'd just like your opinions
