FF, there are many regular ME posters who also blog ... including Molly! It's a convention of courtesy in this group that we don't use our posts to advertise our blogs. If you have a problem with this, well, nobody's forcing you to post here.
In general, if people find your posts interesting and inspiring, they'll check out your profile, where you can post a link to your website/blog. Personally - and this is just some fiercely free feedback in the style you seem to prefer - I've been to your blog and there was nothing posted there which I found interesting enough to make me want to go back ... Francis On 15 Jul., 17:46, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:> Just to clarify, FF, > Minds Eye does not have a problem with links > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct folks to > > your personal website. This is what is generally considered shameless > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise like links > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion. > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self promotion etc. > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist education > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems to be a > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no common-sense > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote a > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" (May 18, > 2010) : > I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, in the > course of a discussion. > > Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a > conversation. > You only put across yourself, what you know and have to say, in > terms > and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak for > everyone > here. > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to your > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which is > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with alphabet > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you do not > deserve anything else than that. > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment of > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the meaningless > guideline of Minds-Eye group. > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:> At > > > any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 dimensional > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by Kaplan. "A loose > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international relations posited by > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process in > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to reflect the > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement." > > > > The bipolar system forms the basis of civilization. > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the good & the bad. > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. Then why do such > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear to be > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such political > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. It is the > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model cannot not be > > > blamed for that. > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D universe giving the > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage point?! > > > > In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system will never > > > become multipolar system. > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | > > > > eHow.comhttp://www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4... > > > > Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You have shown > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding links.) > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would agree that > > > > > you are > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your post implies duality > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is but an illusion. > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum physics as well as > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of PROVING anything > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in Minds-Eye space as > > > > > > far > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is competitive and > > > > > > will > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is not an issue. > > > > > > The > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and persevering. > > > > > > I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my post. My objection > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of infinite layers, > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar system. So, now > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number of layers on > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye... > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Any multiverse system will eventually boil down to a bipolar > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you are part of > > > > > > > organised > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option. > > > > > > > Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, Minds-Eye space > > > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to be infinite, in > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will always get > > > > > > > challenged... > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: > > > > > > > > Mar > > > > > > > > 12, 2008 > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each > > > > > > > > layer > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > past is > > > > > > > > ...http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8... > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my > > > > > > > > belief I > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
