I too know something on arming Allan - but what is the genral case?

On 1 Aug, 07:53, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> farming  hmmm know a little about it from crops irrigation,
> fertilizing,plowing, crop rotation, land management, forest management.
> growing mushrooms, composting, haying, dairying, cheese production.. but it
> definitely is not enough my farm is paid off.
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:20 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We have little real idea of whether capitalism has brought wealth
> > beyond dreams.  What we have in economics generally is a wad of
> > polemic and we generally read, ignore or never know much detail, or
> > how to build theories from the ground up or scientific dreams.
> > Take farming as an example.  Try writing down what you know about
> > working land to produce food.  Not much I expect.
> > How about organising the design and production of goods?
> > What about what people really enjoy or might enjoy?
>
> > I suspect the reality of capitalism for most people varies depending
> > on where they live.  I can write a book and maybe make some money
> > Others have never learned to write, but can sign up for months on a
> > tuna boat.  I do virtually sod all in comparison, but get to eat his
> > tuna. I know I would rather have lived differently and think none of
> > this was ever necessary.  When capitalism can't use you it lets you
> > starve or enter benefits limbo if you are lucky.
>
> > I go back to Plato - he realises political systems are crap and writes
> > a crapper one in his own interests.  Is there much difference between
> > Greek leisured society and those well off now?
> > If we bleat about a world fair for all, and do so without
> > consideration of those who want to maintain crude, sexist religions
> > and breed until war seems a good idea, what are we doing?  If we
> > praise capitalism  but don't wonder about what a mess the world is
> > still in, what are we doing?
>
> > Economics is delta hedging intercourse with the penguin and being
> > bothered about Chelsea Clinton's wedding.
>
> > On 1 Aug, 00:09, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > If it did try to represent middle class values it was a small sliver.
> > > The middle class is most of American society and is hugely diverse.
> > > Please refrain from "your"- as you already have noted you do not know
> > > my "your".
>
> > > On Jul 31, 8:40 am, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > That was my point in noting The Graduate as representing your glowing
> > > > middle-class values.
>
> > > > On Jul 31, 5:11 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > It was a strange film but true about "plastics"= the future. The
> > > > > female characters were pathetic and farcical and Dustin was a dolt.
>
> > > > > On Jul 30, 4:18 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Correction:
>
> > > > > > Mrs. Robinson = The Graduate (1967)- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> I_D Allan
>
> Be Paranoid.
> God is always building a better idiot!!!

Reply via email to