On 27 Aug, 15:21, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 Aug, 21:14, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > "... On Aug 24, 4:59 am, Pat <[email protected]> > > wrote: ..." > > > > I view resurrection as easier than the original creation/assemblage of > > > any of us in the first place. Surely it's easier to do something a > > > second time, once you've had practice and a working model (our current > > > incarnation)? So, to my way of thinking, resurrection is FAR easier > > > for God to perform than it would be to create us in the first place > > > and, since THAT'S already the case, the second-time-round is a piece > > > of cake. > > > The view of resurrection -- at least in the reincarnate form you seem > > to imply -- might be valid but not with a god. Any speculation that > > depends on a god or gods to me seems empty and without substance. > > I'll place my faith in science that our energy survives the death of > > this body and on our superiority that some -- properly prepared -- may > > be able to retain that identity we seem to have developed during this > > life. > > One of the kernals of my theory is that energy is the 'stuff' of God. > God is made of energy. I equate the two.
Sorry...meant kernel!!! >- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
