;-)
On 9 Sep., 19:51, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > Vielleicht ist es Zeit für alle zu gehen tippen Sie auf ein Bier und > einen Joint rauchen! > > On Sep 9, 10:28 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would think so, yes. And a reason to leave also. > > > On 9 Sep., 14:36, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "I don't know why you are doing this, but I think RP can speak for > > > himself. Or shall I say: Let him speak for himself!?"- > > > > I was simply offering an explaination for the communication gap. RP > > > will most certainly speak for himself. > > > > "Watering down > > > everything to Ken Wilbur does not help to build the arc in time." > > > > It does seem a bit watered down or oversimplified, doesn't it? I do, > > > however, like how he bridges the gap between pre-modern metaphysics > > > with the intergal post metaphysics. Just makes sense to build on what > > > the mystics and sages have laid down as a foundation without > > > compromising it's integrity. > > > > "He says, his words are meant for people who want to understand them. > > > Fair > > > enough. Take what you get and leave the rest behind is my advice to > > > you, Darkwater." > > > > I have and I have also called him on his contradictions in the past. > > > Is not the purpose of this thread and forum to gain understanding? > > > > On Sep 8, 12:05 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Seems my vegetarian humor differs quite a bit from yours, Allan. ;-) > > > > See what I was going to reply to Darkwater: > > > > > I don't know why you are doing this, but I think RP can speak for > > > > himself. Or shall I say: Let him speak for himself!? Watering down > > > > everything to Ken Wilbur does not help to build the arc in time. He > > > > says, his words are meant for people who want to understand them. Fair > > > > enough. Take what you get and leave the rest behind is my advice to > > > > you, Darkwater. > > > > > On 8 Sep., 17:16, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > LOL Oddly I know exactly what he is saying from different sources. > > > > > it has > > > > > been rumbling around fo eons,, does not make it true and because some > > > > > people > > > > > make something dogma and doctrine of their beliefs still does not > > > > > make it > > > > > true. Some things are interesting to look at but then you let them > > > > > go. To > > > > > me far to many beliefs are based promoted and twisted by people to > > > > > meat > > > > > their own needs. > > > > > Allan > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, DarkwaterBlight > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Oddly, I understand much of what RP is trying to express but it is > > > > > > only on account of my relentless research into the subject of the > > > > > > thread. Culturaly, here in the west, it is not generaly understood > > > > > > that there are two truths, relative and ultimate. Relative truth can > > > > > > be described by means of science and assetions can be made that > > > > > > something is true or false under the conditions assigned. However, > > > > > > RP > > > > > > speaks of ultimate truth and non dual spirit and in doing so, enters > > > > > > into the realm of contradiction as the ultimate is empty of > > > > > > qualities > > > > > > and categorizations. Ken Wilbur describes this as "The Two Truths > > > > > > Doctrine" > > > > > >http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/kosmos/excerptG/part1.cfm > > > > > > > On Sep 8, 5:04 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Words hold so much truth and what we say is but the reflection of > > > > > > > who we > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:20 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > My words are meant for people who want to understand them , for > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > others > > > > > > > > of your ilk they are just ramblings of a madman and so > > > > > > > > this leaves me laughing and gives a smile > > > > > > > I learned a long time ago from Kipling and others to even listen > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > dull and ignorant for they to have their stories. > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > Gruff , I ask you again to be happy as I did the last time when > > > > > > > you > > > > > > clashed > > > > > > > > > with me. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM, gruff <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> "... On Sep 7, 9:33 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: ..." > > > > > > > > >> > By using words like ' I believe' etc. doesn't make one 's > > > > > > > >> > words > > > > > > less > > > > > > > >> > arrogant. It is the content which matters. If you have made > > > > > > > >> > up your > > > > > > mind > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >> > find fault in me you will continue to do so on one pretext > > > > > > > >> > or the > > > > > > other. > > > > > > > >> > Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder and so does all else. > > > > > > > > >> It is hoped that by use of such phrases over time a true > > > > > > > >> respect for > > > > > > > >> others will develop in other dimensions of your being. Your > > > > > > > >> words do > > > > > > > >> not show any such respect for anyone elses words but your own > > > > > > > >> which > > > > > > > >> you seem to hold in the highest esteem. Your words almost > > > > > > > >> demand some > > > > > > > >> form of worship just for you having said them. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > I_D Allan > > > > > > > > Be Paranoid. > > > > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > -- > > > > > ( > > > > > ) > > > > > I_D Allan > > > > > > Be Paranoid. > > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
