I have two posts not showing up.  Google or Moderation?

On Sep 13, 7:59 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> More nonsense AW?
>
> ............so it is quite impossible to do good for man, except by
> accident???
>
> Really, wow what a preposterous notion.  I guess science, technology
> and the great strides and advancement in the medical industry is no
> match for this mythical christ person.
>
> Whether the person historically existed is questionable but the whole
> notion of a virgin birth, son of god, miracle worker etc etc etc is
> mythical at best.  It is all so obvious to me that it all comes down
> to man's pathetic quest to become a god and so through these stories
> man has become god.  Man has made himself holy, man has made himself
> god.  Go on and worship your man god if you want, I don't have any
> problem with it, I just don't believe any of it.
>
> On Sep 13, 12:39 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, you "can have a feeling of responsibility towards society and
> > consider it your duty towards it and do what is good for you and the
> > others". But what have feelings to do with doing good?
>
> > A man comes upon a starving man, knowing little about human nature,
> > offers him a good thick steak and a glass of wine. But the starving
> > man cannot digest the food. The first man had a sincere "feeling of
> > responsibility", and really wanted to "do what is good for the other",
> > but utterly botched it, because he is ignorant of what is really good
> > for the other man.
>
> > No doubt those with a "humanitarian mindset" mean well, and act in
> > accord with what they believe is good for fellow humans, just like the
> > Jihadist, or the mercy killer who euthanizes the sick patient, or the
> > abortionist, or Hitler. Everybody does what he /believes/ to be good
> > for his fellow man. But only those who /know/ what is good for their
> > neighbor can consistently deliver.
>
> > On the Christian view, if we do not know Christ, we do not know what
> > man is, so it is quite impossible to do good for man, except by
> > accident.
>
> > On Sep 13, 10:30 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > A person can have a humanitarian mindset regardless of religion. You don't
> > > have to believe in God to be good , you can have a feeling of 
> > > responsibility
> > > towards society and  consider it your duty towards it and do what is good
> > > for you and the others. Patriots need not be religious , yet they feel a
> > > great responsibility towards their country. There are so many motives for 
> > > a
> > > man  to do good to others irrespective of religion. On the other hand 
> > > people
> > > are known to indulge in vice and ask God's forgiveness later.
>
> > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Sure, "helping is primal". But the Jihadist, having a different
> > > > theology than the Christian, believes he is helping you by converting
> > > > you to Islam by the sword. Not so the Christian, for whom religion is
> > > > the "The voluntary subjection of oneself to God".
>
> > > > The island of atheists? Sure, they'd "help others" for some definition
> > > > of "help" and "others". I know something about the Christian command
> > > > to love my neighbor but don't know the official atheist dogma on
> > > > helping others.  If one acted like there were no God why would he
> > > > think he has any duty to help others?
>
> > > > On Sep 12, 8:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > AW;
> > > > > Yes there is.............
> > > > > I'll refer you to rigsy's  sept. 6 10:15 am post as to my "theistic
> > > > > religiosity" comment.
>
> > > > > Also, people use therapy and AA like a religion- in fact, they "use" a
> > > > > lot of things in lieu of religion. What about jingoism? <<<rigsy
>
> > > > > Do you think no one would help anyone else on an island of atheists
> > > > > because they didn't have a religion to tell them to do so?   Helping
> > > > > is primal and innate as nurturing; religion and faith is human
> > > > > construct and not necessity.

Reply via email to