As it turns out it was a google problem, so not to worry; I deleted the redundancy posts.
I'm not new nor wet behind the ears; Welcome aboard Heebong Kim! On Sep 13, 11:48 pm, Heebong Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > It says that new member's posts are moderated. I don't know if you're a new > member, but that may be an explanation. > > > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:43:36 -0700 > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Isn't Religion Wonderful..........? > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > I have two posts not showing up. Google or Moderation? > > > On Sep 13, 7:59 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > More nonsense AW? > > > > ............so it is quite impossible to do good for man, except by > > > accident??? > > > > Really, wow what a preposterous notion. I guess science, technology > > > and the great strides and advancement in the medical industry is no > > > match for this mythical christ person. > > > > Whether the person historically existed is questionable but the whole > > > notion of a virgin birth, son of god, miracle worker etc etc etc is > > > mythical at best. It is all so obvious to me that it all comes down > > > to man's pathetic quest to become a god and so through these stories > > > man has become god. Man has made himself holy, man has made himself > > > god. Go on and worship your man god if you want, I don't have any > > > problem with it, I just don't believe any of it. > > > > On Sep 13, 12:39 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, you "can have a feeling of responsibility towards society and > > > > consider it your duty towards it and do what is good for you and the > > > > others". But what have feelings to do with doing good? > > > > > A man comes upon a starving man, knowing little about human nature, > > > > offers him a good thick steak and a glass of wine. But the starving > > > > man cannot digest the food. The first man had a sincere "feeling of > > > > responsibility", and really wanted to "do what is good for the other", > > > > but utterly botched it, because he is ignorant of what is really good > > > > for the other man. > > > > > No doubt those with a "humanitarian mindset" mean well, and act in > > > > accord with what they believe is good for fellow humans, just like the > > > > Jihadist, or the mercy killer who euthanizes the sick patient, or the > > > > abortionist, or Hitler. Everybody does what he /believes/ to be good > > > > for his fellow man. But only those who /know/ what is good for their > > > > neighbor can consistently deliver. > > > > > On the Christian view, if we do not know Christ, we do not know what > > > > man is, so it is quite impossible to do good for man, except by > > > > accident. > > > > > On Sep 13, 10:30 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > A person can have a humanitarian mindset regardless of religion. You > > > > > don't > > > > > have to believe in God to be good , you can have a feeling of > > > > > responsibility > > > > > towards society and consider it your duty towards it and do what is > > > > > good > > > > > for you and the others. Patriots need not be religious , yet they > > > > > feel a > > > > > great responsibility towards their country. There are so many motives > > > > > for a > > > > > man to do good to others irrespective of religion. On the other hand > > > > > people > > > > > are known to indulge in vice and ask God's forgiveness later. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Sure, "helping is primal". But the Jihadist, having a different > > > > > > theology than the Christian, believes he is helping you by > > > > > > converting > > > > > > you to Islam by the sword. Not so the Christian, for whom religion > > > > > > is > > > > > > the "The voluntary subjection of oneself to God". > > > > > > > The island of atheists? Sure, they'd "help others" for some > > > > > > definition > > > > > > of "help" and "others". I know something about the Christian command > > > > > > to love my neighbor but don't know the official atheist dogma on > > > > > > helping others. If one acted like there were no God why would he > > > > > > think he has any duty to help others? > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 8:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > AW; > > > > > > > Yes there is............. > > > > > > > I'll refer you to rigsy's sept. 6 10:15 am post as to my > > > > > > > "theistic > > > > > > > religiosity" comment. > > > > > > > > Also, people use therapy and AA like a religion- in fact, they > > > > > > > "use" a > > > > > > > lot of things in lieu of religion. What about jingoism? <<<rigsy > > > > > > > > Do you think no one would help anyone else on an island of > > > > > > > atheists > > > > > > > because they didn't have a religion to tell them to do so? > > > > > > > Helping > > > > > > > is primal and innate as nurturing; religion and faith is human > > > > > > > construct and not necessity.
