Hey Nanook, yes this is true.  Hah hah then I guess I must live in an
intolorant sociaty as I offten find myself in all sorts of troubles
for merely broaching certian ideas and principles I hold.

Meh!



On Jan 21, 1:43 am, TheRealNanook <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the welcome - and the good replies.
>
> First a reply about the A3 Society. I started the society and set up
> the website to try to implement social changes based on the principles
> I outline in my books. And for anyone interested in reading them, you
> can read most of the books free at Smashwords. I also copied a lot of
> the text into the subject headings on the A3society.org site. Sure, I
> hope to sell a lot of books some day.  But, I’d be much happier if the
> principles I talk about there bring some breakthroughs to society.
>
> Responding to Ash’s point, I fully agree with your observation about
> the psycho dimension. This “internal drive” is complex and is built up
> in us over time for many reasons - starvation for example. I was just
> focusing on the social aspect, because I think that was the one that
> causes people the most pain - when others judge us greedy - and what
> the term greed usually refers to. Your psycho point then comes into
> play. Resolving the pain usually requires some kind of psycho
> adjustment.
>
> Responding to Lee, I agree that what one person judges as greed may be
> very different from the society around them. But what happens then? I
> think this brings out my point about the social character of greed. If
> the community is tolerant, they let a single viewpoint that differs
> from their own just go about their business.  But if the community is
> rigid, the person could end up in a lot of trouble. And that’s what
> paints the history of the concept of greed over time. It is usually
> directly tied to the overall wellbeing of the society. If everyone has
> plenty of food, they could care less about the guy who eats like a
> king. But if everyone is starving, they don’t easily tolerate someone
> who eats like a king, even if he IS the king.
>
> And, as I said in my comment, this same situation applies to all of
> the seven deadly sins (pride, greed, lust, anger, gluttony, envy,
> laziness ).
>
> On Jan 18, 6:30 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Welomce from me too Nanook,
>
> > I sorta agree with you here but greed can of course be judged by the
> > individual also, independantly or social mores.  That is what one may
> > find greedy may or may not measure up to what ever sociaty one finds
> > themselves in says about greed.
>
> > On Jan 18, 6:58 am, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Welcome Nanook, I certainly hope it's not bad form because I do it all
> > > the time. Maybe I'll have a website or book to hock someday too but
> > > until then you will all have to wait in anticipation (or fear). :)
>
> > > I really only have input on a part of the post, that Greed is defined by
> > > what the society finds to be acceptable behavior. To make it sound less
> > > arbitrary and avoid going down the 'culture of greed' road we should say
> > > in judging greed there are psycho and social dimensions. To touch on
> > > both I think we should ask at what cost to values, ethics and principles
> > > will one pursue their desire. For example I might find it reasonable for
> > > someone in Haiti to keep a surplus if they were able, but to desire an
> > > unreasonable excess at the expense of someone else's having enough would
> > > not be right. Would it be greedy to have ten thousand pounds of food
> > > shipped to my house, keeping one thousand for myself and handing out the
> > > rest to local relief depots? I don't think so. Noone can say what
> > > psychological factors are playing out except by what behaviors the
> > > person exhibits, like their charitable nature or compassion for those
> > > around them. Now if someone has that much food shipped in so they can
> > > feel mighty amongst the starving, I say maybe someone would notice how
> > > fat the guy is getting who eats a 10oz steak in front of the picture
> > > window for each meal. They come and take the food, eat him too, and
> > > nobody feels at a loss.
>
> > > On 1/17/2011 12:16 PM, TheRealNanook wrote:
>
> > > > I’m new to the group. I hope it’s OK to join the discussion near it’s
> > > > starting point.
>
> > > > I think the word greed explains a lot of the tragedy that we see in
> > > > society today. We could address that tragedy better if we saw the
> > > > contribution that greed was making to it.
>
> > > > My first point is that greed has been known to be a problem for a long
> > > > time. It is often listed as the second of the SEVEN DEADLY SINS. Why
> > > > this is important is because I believe the Seven Deadly Sins can
> > > > explain most of problems in human society due to human psychology. I
> > > > spend a lot of time on this in my books if anyone wants to explore
> > > > this further.
>
> > > > Second, I think the discussion got off on the wrong foot. We need to
> > > > read Webster’s definition more carefully.  It says, “more of something
> > > > than is NEEDED.” Specifically, this phrasing does not limit greed to
> > > > the environment of a single person. In fact, what makes greed, and all
> > > > the Seven Deadly Sins, rank so highly as human faults is their SOCIAL
> > > > expression in a social context. The first example is a good example to
> > > > explore this.
>
> > > > If a person, who lives in an expensive tenement in NYC spends a
> > > > million dollars on a painting, it may not be greed. But if the same
> > > > person happens to live in one of the few surviving houses in Haiti,
> > > > while people are starving to death in the street outside his front
> > > > door, then society would label that greed. If the same millionaire, in
> > > > Haiti, stockpiled just 2 weeks worth of groceries, an amount that no
> > > > one in most of the U.S. would even blink at, while everyone else was
> > > > living hand to mouth, society would label that greed.
> > > > The point is, this directly contradicts the notion stated in the first
> > > > post that, “NOBODY can judge what another person finds important ...”
> > > > The whole concept of greed, and the other SINS, is based on its social
> > > > implications.
>
> > > > To make the meaning of greed clear, as used in society, Webster’s
> > > > definition needs a few more words: a selfish and excessive desire for
> > > > more of something than is needed IN THE OPINION OF SOCIETY. And that’s
> > > > the stickler!
> > > > Look how this point comes into play in the last paragraph of the
> > > > post.  It says, “if you have 
REASONABLE plans for every single
> > > > dollar? THAT IS NOT GREED...”  The devil is in the word “reasonable”.
> > > > And what society means by reasonable is what SOCIETY accepts as
> > > > reasonable.
>
> > > > The reason this is so important right now is how it will play out as
> > > > the mortgage disaster starts to really unwind. Note well, this
> > > > disaster is NOT about houses. It’s about the people thrown into the
> > > > street. To date, the banks have thrown the equivalent of 6 Haiti
> > > > earthquakes of U.S. adults and children into the street. They will
> > > > create the equivalent of another Haiti of homeless people every 3
> > > > months in 2011! And what is it that they want?  PROFITS!: to get back
> > > > to the level of bonuses they got before the crash.
>
> > > > For those interested, you can read more at  
> > > > http://www.a3society.org/7%20Deadly%20Sins
>
> > > > On Dec 12 2010, 4:55 am, BB47<[email protected]>  wrote:
> > > >> The word “greed” is tossed out so often and it always intrigues me
> > > >> just what people mean by it. Just what is “greed?”  Some people (no
> > > >> names) toss this word off their fingertips all the time and frankly I
> > > >> HAVE HAD ENOUGH.
>
> > > >>   Webster defines this word as…
> > > >> : a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (as money) than
> > > >> is needed.
>
> > > >> Ok, let’s take a more careful look at that definition.  Let’s say a
> > > >> very rich person spends a million dollars on a painting that he just
> > > >> loves.  He thinks this painting is so remarkable, so beautiful, that
> > > >> he is willing to buy it for a million dollars so he can look at it
> > > >> every day in his house.   Me personally?  I would never spend a
> > > >> million dollars on a painting, but that is just me.  That painting, or
> > > >> ANY painting, is not something I am interested in buying at that
> > > >> price, even if I was filthy rich.  But the things that I buy would
> > > >> curl your hair as they might seem so “strange” to YOU, but not to me.
> > > >> Everybody is different, and this is a very important thing to
> > > >> consider.  NOBODY can judge what another person finds important,
> > > >> interesting, beautiful, desirable, or worthwhile.  (Just look at your
> > > >> hairstyle…smily thingee goes here)
>
> > > >> The question is…is that greed?  I don’t think so.  Is buying anything
> > > >> that one does not “need” greed?  Hell no!  you better check your
> > > >> inventory of your life if that is the case, you would find that every
> > > >> human on earth is greedy, and therefore the definition is rendered
> > > >> meaningless.  The definition clearly states “an EXCESSIVE desire for
> > > >> MORE of SOMETHING”
>
> > > >>     This says to me that greed is only achieved when you already HAVE
> > > >> “enough” of this particular “thing” and yet you want more anyway.  You
> > > >> want more than you can actually “benefit” from because you already
> > > >> have  “it”   THAT is greed.  When you “hoard” something for no reason,
> > > >> and NOT when you simply “want” something that you don’t have.  Wanting
> > > >> something IS NOT GREED.  Get that through your fricking head.  Wanting
> > > >> something that is not “needed” is not greed.   Wanting something you
> > > >> already have plenty of is greed.
>
> > > >>     Which brings us, inevitably, to money.  Money can be turned into
> > > >> ANYTHING, so one cannot say that you have a quantity of this
> > > >> particular one “thing” that meets the
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to