Perhaps you could just start your own group...
On Mar 8, 7:39 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > I would suggest to expand Ian's posting guidelines and add "no killer > phrases allowed" in order to get a decent discussion style going here. > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:18 PM, ornamentalmind > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Such a fantasy about 'control mechanisms' is just that... > > > On Mar 8, 6:06 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Where have the control mechanisms gone that prevent one single loony > > > autocrat having his shaky fingers on buttons and triggers? My friend says > > > it's the boy's mother's fault. She is a girls' mother. I would say that > > this > > > view is too narrow. > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, ornamentalmind > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > gabby 'baby'...when it comes to 'form' your opinion is noted and not > > > > agreed with at all nor is your 'expertise' found to be of value nor > > > > interest. > > > > > I need no help at all, thank you very much and did think twice before > > > > putting you on moderation this time. > > > > > Your incessant badgering has been addressed ad nauseam. Cease and > > > > desist. > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:57 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No sulking, please, orn. We very much appreciate your expertise, only > > the > > > > > form is sometimes a little inadequate. > > > > > > So what about BB47's complaint about being moderated? And yes, who is > > > > > presently in charge of the moderating and deleting spam business? Do > > you > > > > > need help? > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:52 AM, ornamentalmind > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > I guess this means you won't respond to my questions PSK, right? > > > > > > > On Mar 7, 4:17 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:39 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Where did Poly ask for your judgement, orny baby? Has the mod > > god > > > > job > > > > > > gone > > > > > > > > to your head the wrong way up? She asked for opinions. Mind the > > > > > > difference. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:39 PM, ornamentalmind < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> “i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or > > > > theological > > > > > > > >> mode of > > > > > > > >> understanding things...the world.... “ – PSK > > > > > > > > >> Well, that does point towards an area of your beliefs so > > thanks > > > > for > > > > > > > >> this much. Perhaps you could be even more specific? > > > > > > > > >> As far as I’ve found out…reviewing human thought over the > > ages,… > > > > > > > >> secular and religious views often are at the very least > > > > intertwined. > > > > > > > > >> On the other hand, perhaps you are being much more literal > > when > > > > you > > > > > > > >> use the notion of “…mode of understanding things…”. If this is > > the > > > > > > > >> case, a more specific unpacking of what the two apparently (to > > > > you) > > > > > > > >> different modes would be of value, OK? > > > > > > > > >> I’ll suspend judgment until I hear more. > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 7, 3:01 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or > > > > theological > > > > > > mode > > > > > > > >> of > > > > > > > >> > understanding things...the world.... > > > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, ornamentalmind > > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > “…revolution in knowledge and philosophy…” – PSK ??? > > > > > > > > >> > > To continue the discussion, one would need to know what > > you > > > > mean > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > >> > > Would you unpack it a bit? > > > > > > > > >> > > Before actually knowing what you mean, I see little if any > > > > > > > >> > > ‘revolution’ in this context. Yes, there is a process of > > > > change in > > > > > > > >> > > thought over the millennia yet such general ‘change’ > > doesn’t > > > > mean > > > > > > a > > > > > > > >> > > progression towards a more accurate view. Case in point – > > you > > > > are > > > > > > > >> > > apparently using the dialectical view of one view being in > > > > > > > >> > > contradiction with another. While many do apprehend in > > this > > > > way, > > > > > > in no > > > > > > > >> > > way is that an indicator of the accuracy of such a view. > > > > > > > > >> > > As best as I can see, both can be known consubstantially. > > > > > > > > >> > > On Mar 7, 2:25 am, "pol.science kid" < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > I was thinking .... i agree with what yuo guys say > > ....could > > > > it > > > > > > also > > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > revolution in knowledge and philosophy...when it was > > > > > > > >> questioned....what > > > > > > > >> > > > can an INdividual know.....it kind of pitts one against > > the > > > > > > whole in > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > >> > > > struggle to know...or salvation through knowledge...what > > > > say.... > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, pol.science kid < > > > > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > > > > >> > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > True we have come a long way..and the word has been > > taken > > > > for > > > > > > > >> > > > > granted....but i would like an opinion of each one of > > you > > > > > > ...on > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > >> > > > > Sanctity of Freedom.... it is also my casual inference > > > > > > > >> > > > > that....individuality ...the modern obsession with > > > > it....how > > > > > > come > > > > > > > >> > > > > some primitive tribes...hold the community at a level > > > > above > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > > individual....while it is not quite so in our > > > > > > 'modernised'...or > > > > > > > >> rather > > > > > > > >> > > > > westernised world.....are there concepts of > > radicalised > > > > > > > >> individuality > > > > > > > >> > > > > in the oriental philosophy..... need your opoinions > > > > fellows > > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > > > > >> > > > \--/ Peace > > > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > > > >> > \--/ Peace > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > \--/ Peace
