Scissors, Allan, I'm more into scissors.

*Cheers :)*

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:57 AM, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh yeah Gabby could I interest you in a Damascus blade Japanese sword??
> If so which length would you be desiring?
>
> Oh yeah they are hand forged..  (",)
> Allan
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Pat, do me a very big favour, please, and don't forget to hear what Binah
>> is saying also. There have been so many bad examples of imposed
>> post-colonial mindsets at work here, that your detachment from the profane
>> comes in as a bliss. Mind the Native American spirituality. Thanks.
>>
>> Welcome Binah! :) I'll try my best to protect you from the sharks here. ;)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Pat <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 10, 9:00 pm, Binah Hochma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Thank you all for the many welcomes.  I have been gone for the week and
>>> see
>>> > I have a lot of reading to do.
>>> > Pat, I will have many Q's for you.  I have only been looking at
>>> Kabbalah for
>>> > three or four years now. It is a many faceted philosophy and I have
>>> found so
>>> > many different opinions, it is difficult to understand some of the
>>> > teachings.  But I find that this is true for everything.
>>> >
>>> > Most of my friends would consider me a Christian (as long as I keep all
>>> > those disputable matters between me and G-d) but am no longer involved
>>> in
>>> > what would be considered "traditional church".  I have study some
>>> eastern
>>> > spirituality and Kabbalah, but mostly Native American spirituality.
>>> > I am looking forward to learning from all of you.  The first thing I
>>> really
>>> > need to know is the most efficient way to use this site.  I have all
>>> your
>>> > post coming up in my email, which is fine.  I hit "reply to all"  at
>>> the
>>> > bottom of the last post, which was Pat's.  Will it show up at the
>>> bottom of
>>> > the list?  I guess I will see after I hit send.  Maybe it would be
>>> easier to
>>> > just go to the group site instead of using my email???
>>> > Binah
>>> >
>>>
>>> It DID show up at the bottom of the list, but I suspect that was
>>> because you replied to me, and my response was, prior to yours, at the
>>> bottom.  But, yours is also indented under mine to show that it was in
>>> direct response.  I come in through 'Google Groups' and just Google's
>>> format for displaying the messages.  It's really a matter of personal
>>> taste ultimately.
>>>
>>> As far as any questions go, fire away; I'll do my best.
>>>
>>> I noticed you left the 'o' out of God (unusual for a Christian), which
>>> is a Jewish tradition--note that I'm only noting it, not criticising
>>> it.  I'll do it if I know I'm conversing with Jews out of respect but,
>>> for the most part, I write the word with all the letters.  There's
>>> nothing in the Torah forbidding the use of ANY English term for the
>>> Supreme Being anyway (or, in fact, any reference to English at
>>> all...if there were, you'd KNOW it was an anachronism), so the usage
>>> of the word, in full, does NOT break any of the 613 comandments in the
>>> Torah anyway.  It's purely done, as you know, out of respect FOR the
>>> Supreme Being and a sincere effort to try to not use the name in
>>> vain.
>>>
>>> Just as an example of a known anachronism in the Torah, there's the
>>> comment in Genesis that says that Abraham was from "Ur, of the
>>> Chaldees".  Abraham lived, according to the text of Genesis, in the
>>> early part of the second millenium BCE (i.e., 2999 BCE through
>>> 2500BCE), yet the Chaldeans weren't in control of 'Ur' until the sixth
>>> century BCE--a difference of, at least, 1900 years.  It becomes
>>> obvious from that point that Genesis was 'redacted' DURING or AFTER
>>> the Chaldeans were in Ur.  In other words, the words 'of the Chaldees'
>>> could NOT have been an original part of of the 'revealed Torah' as the
>>> term is a huge anachronism.
>>>
>>> If you've been looking at Kabbalah for 3-4 years, you've probably
>>> already discovered that the Tree of Life is a great methodolgy for
>>> categorising information.  If I'm correct, it's also a schematic for
>>> how the universe's various dimensions relate to one another.  Each
>>> sephira is a dimension and the paths are the ways in which those
>>> dimensions communicate.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'm all ears when it comes to your questions.  I look forward
>>> to hearing them!!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Pat
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Pat <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On Mar 2, 5:40 pm, Binah Hochma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > I just thought I would say hi.  I joined the group a couple of day
>>> ago
>>> > > and
>>> > > > am still reading over the latest post. Some interesting thoughts on
>>> the
>>> > > > existence of God and the soul.
>>> > > > I am new to the whole internet community thing and don't spend a
>>> lot of
>>> > > time
>>> > > > on the computer so bare with me.
>>> > > > To the Moderators, thanks for creating a safe place to exchange
>>> thoughts
>>> > > and
>>> > > > ideas and to encourage each other to grow spiritually.
>>> > > > Binah
>>> >
>>> > > Great Name..Binah Hochma!!  I'll translate it for the others...it's
>>> > > Hebrew for 'Understanding Wisdom'.  Obviously, you have a background
>>> > > in either Judaism, Hebrew itself or, most likely, the Kabbalah, as
>>> the
>>> > > two words are Sephiroth on the Tree of Life.  Welcome aboard.  I've
>>> > > been studying Kabbalah for around 35 years, now; thus your name came
>>> > > screaming out at me.  Anyway, welcome aboard!!- Hide quoted text -
>>> >
>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> I_D Allan
>
> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
>
>

Reply via email to