Sorry if I sound insulting but this just sounds like a bunch of mystical obfuscation. You're not by chance trying to sell some self-help books or starting your own cult are you?
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > God is aware in the sense that He is all or all emanates from Him and > thus automatically He knows everything and doesn't have to be aware of > things like us mortals. In my opinion , we should not conceive of Him > to be conscious in the way that we are because our consciousness > entails duality or is encompassed within borders. He is conscious in > us , acts in us but in His separate state He is oblivious of all as He > alone is and creation being changeable and subject to birth and death > is just an illusion. In my view that which is not permanent can be > called an illusion. > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, ornamentalmind > <[email protected]> wrote: > > RP, are you suggesting that god is not conscious at all?...that all > > god is/does etc. is unconscious? > > > > In either case, are you using one of the more common notions of what > > conscious means…like being self aware and knowing what one is doing? > > > > > > On Apr 22, 1:45 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In my view , creation was not a conscious act of God , but rather the > >> universe emanated from the unconscious mind of God. He doesn't look at > >> us consciously , doesn't connect results with actions , rather > >> everything is happening according to laws which exist in His > >> unconscious mind. I don't think that any scripture can really lay down > >> definitions of good and bad with His authority , rather thinkers among > >> us can lay down rules which appear logical to them and accepted by us > >> as such. I don't believe in an after-life and consider this life > >> itself to be a spiritual experience. > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Chuck Bowling > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:55 AM, [email protected] > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >> Hey Chuck, > >> > >> >> I guess it depends on what you belive God is. > >> > >> >> If you believe that God is the creator then everything has Gods hand > >> >> in it, if you further belive that God is omipitant then God you are > >> >> exactly the way that God has designed you to be. > >> > >> > I believe that god/goddess/gods etc. are icons. They are concepts that > help > >> > people cope with their own frailties and inadequacies. Whether it be > to > >> > blame bad things on, attribute good things to, or to provide us a path > to > >> > continue our existence beyond the grave. > >> > >> >> If you are a gardner, and you splice together two differant plants to > >> >> gain a desird result, the plant does have a life of it's own, but > >> >> works in the way you have designd it to. So in a real way you are > the > >> >> manipulator of that plants life, your hand is in all that it does, as > >> >> you have designed it. > >> > >> > Here I would say that the original design was altered. A much easier > task > >> > than the original design. > >> > >> > As I may have mentioned in a previous post, I readily accept the > possibility > >> > that some entity may have created this universe. And, I think that > anything > >> > with that kind of power would probably appear to be omniscient to us. > >> > However, I also believe that it is VERY unlikely that any entity that > could > >> > have created this reality would bare even the slightest resemblance to > >> > anything we describe as a god. > >> > >> > The reasoning for that seems fairly straightforward to me: > >> > >> > Most of the gods we have created seem to be pretty damn lame. I mean > come > >> > on. You want me to kill a goat, sacrifice a virgin, or set fire to a > wax > >> > stick in your honor. REALLY??? And you're going to send me to hell for > >> > eternity because I thought the neighbor's wife was a hot piece of > tail? > >> > Jeesh. As gods go you suck dude. > >> > >> > Another thing. You would think that god would find a better way of > >> > correcting bad behavior than to fry people for an eternity. Even we > lowly > >> > humans know that setting someone on fire is not the best way to > convince 'em > >> > to mend their ways. > >> > >> > Lastly but not finally. If god created this reality then at a minimum > he > >> > created one and possibly infinitely more universes. In this one there > are an > >> > estimated 300 sextillion stars. That's 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 > stars > >> > if you're looking for precision. You would think that with all that > stuff > >> > floating around out there that he/she/it would have better things to > do than > >> > make sure that little johnnies prayers are answered with a brand new > bike on > >> > his birthday. > >> > >> > My guess is that any entity capable of creating all of this would see > us as > >> > a minor infestation of germs at best. > >> > >> >> On Apr 20, 5:40 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:32 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > > Whatever work I do and the effort that I make , is it God doing > it ? > >> >> > > No , I do it all , but It is God who gives me the strength to do > it. > >> >> > > Without His strength even the resolve to do anything wouldn't > come to > >> >> > > my mind. > >> > >> >> > Now when you say that God is giving you strength can you be more > >> >> > specific? > >> >> > Is he providing your mitochondria with more ADP or is he upping > your > >> >> > serotonin or dopamine levels to give you a greater feeling of > reward for > >> >> > your accomplishments? > >> > >> >> > And, if so, can you tell me exactly how he does that? I mean, is he > >> >> > causing > >> >> > re-uptake inhibition or is he actually producing a greater volume > of > >> >> > chemical messengers at the synapse? > >> > >> >> > I guess if it's psychological strength it would have to be the > latter. > >> >> > If it > >> >> > were greater physical strength then you'd probably be able to lift > cars > >> >> > off > >> >> > the ground. >
