damn chuck  ,    RP sounds like a hindu , i belive all religion leaves
room for interpretations , but to make definate and solid conclusions
seems ...... ?

Chuck Bowling wrote:
> Sorry if I sound insulting but this just sounds like a bunch of mystical
> obfuscation. You're not by chance trying to sell some self-help books or
> starting your own cult are you?
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > God is aware in the sense that He is all or all emanates from Him and
> > thus automatically He knows everything and doesn't have to be aware of
> > things like us mortals. In my opinion , we should not conceive of Him
> > to be conscious in the way that we are because our consciousness
> > entails duality or is encompassed within borders. He is conscious in
> > us , acts in us but in His separate state He is oblivious of all as He
> > alone is and creation being changeable and subject to birth and death
> > is just an illusion. In my view that which is not permanent can be
> > called an illusion.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, ornamentalmind
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > RP, are you suggesting that god is not conscious at all?...that all
> > > god is/does etc. is unconscious?
> > >
> > > In either case, are you using one of the more common notions of what
> > > conscious means…like being self aware and knowing what one is doing?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 22, 1:45 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> In my view , creation was not a conscious act of God , but rather the
> > >> universe emanated from the unconscious mind of God. He doesn't look at
> > >> us consciously , doesn't connect results with actions , rather
> > >> everything is happening according to laws which exist in His
> > >> unconscious mind. I don't think that any scripture can really lay down
> > >> definitions of good and bad with His authority , rather thinkers among
> > >> us can lay down rules which appear logical to them and accepted by us
> > >> as such. I don't believe in an after-life and consider this life
> > >> itself to be a spiritual experience.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Chuck Bowling
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:55 AM, [email protected]
> > >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >> Hey Chuck,
> > >>
> > >> >> I guess it depends on what you belive God is.
> > >>
> > >> >> If you believe that God is the creator then everything has Gods hand
> > >> >> in it,  if you further belive that God is omipitant then God you are
> > >> >> exactly the way that God has designed you to be.
> > >>
> > >> > I believe that god/goddess/gods etc. are icons. They are concepts that
> > help
> > >> > people cope with their own frailties and inadequacies. Whether it be
> > to
> > >> > blame bad things on, attribute good things to, or to provide us a path
> > to
> > >> > continue our existence beyond the grave.
> > >>
> > >> >> If you are a gardner, and you splice together two differant plants to
> > >> >> gain a desird result, the plant does have a life of it's own, but
> > >> >> works in the way you have designd it to.  So in a real way you are
> > the
> > >> >> manipulator of that plants life, your hand is in all that it does, as
> > >> >> you have designed it.
> > >>
> > >> > Here I would say that the original design was altered. A much easier
> > task
> > >> > than the original design.
> > >>
> > >> > As I may have mentioned in a previous post, I readily accept the
> > possibility
> > >> > that some entity may have created this universe. And, I think that
> > anything
> > >> > with that kind of power would probably appear to be omniscient to us.
> > >> > However, I also believe that it is VERY unlikely that any entity that
> > could
> > >> > have created this reality would bare even the slightest resemblance to
> > >> > anything we describe as a god.
> > >>
> > >> > The reasoning for that seems fairly straightforward to me:
> > >>
> > >> > Most of the gods we have created seem to be pretty damn lame. I mean
> > come
> > >> > on. You want me to kill a goat, sacrifice a virgin, or set fire to a
> > wax
> > >> > stick in your honor. REALLY??? And you're going to send me to hell for
> > >> > eternity because I thought the neighbor's wife was a hot piece of
> > tail?
> > >> > Jeesh. As gods go you suck dude.
> > >>
> > >> > Another thing. You would think that god would find a better way of
> > >> > correcting bad behavior than to fry people for an eternity. Even we
> > lowly
> > >> > humans know that setting someone on fire is not the best way to
> > convince 'em
> > >> > to mend their ways.
> > >>
> > >> > Lastly but not finally. If god created this reality then at a minimum
> > he
> > >> > created one and possibly infinitely more universes. In this one there
> > are an
> > >> > estimated 300 sextillion stars. That's 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
> > stars
> > >> > if you're looking for precision. You would think that with all that
> > stuff
> > >> > floating around out there that he/she/it would have better things to
> > do than
> > >> > make sure that little johnnies prayers are answered with a brand new
> > bike on
> > >> > his birthday.
> > >>
> > >> > My guess is that any entity capable of creating all of this would see
> > us as
> > >> > a minor infestation of germs at best.
> > >>
> > >> >> On Apr 20, 5:40 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:32 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > > Whatever work I do and the effort that I make , is it God doing
> > it ?
> > >> >> > > No , I do it all , but It is God who gives me the strength to do
> > it.
> > >> >> > > Without His strength even the resolve to do anything wouldn't
> > come to
> > >> >> > > my mind.
> > >>
> > >> >> > Now when you say that God is giving you strength can you be more
> > >> >> > specific?
> > >> >> > Is he providing your mitochondria with more ADP or is he upping
> > your
> > >> >> > serotonin or dopamine levels to give you a greater feeling of
> > reward for
> > >> >> > your accomplishments?
> > >>
> > >> >> > And, if so, can you tell me exactly how he does that? I mean, is he
> > >> >> > causing
> > >> >> > re-uptake inhibition or is he actually producing a greater volume
> > of
> > >> >> > chemical messengers at the synapse?
> > >>
> > >> >> > I guess if it's psychological strength it would have to be the
> > latter.
> > >> >> > If it
> > >> >> > were greater physical strength then you'd probably be able to lift
> > cars
> > >> >> > off
> > >> >> > the ground.
> >

Reply via email to