On Oct 7, 7:54 pm, Jo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm American and I love my country. My grandparents were immigrants. I > found their names on the registry at Ellis Island :-) I love the > people in this country, even the a-holes. Our diversity makes us > colorful, and we are proof that different cultures can exist > peacefully within the same borders. Our freedoms give us the ability > to express who we are and you can guarantee that someone will come to > your rescue if anyone else tries to deny you of that right. > > On the other hand. The American government embarrasses the hell out of > me. The culture of the politician has come too far away from the > culture of the citizens. Their agenda's do not even come close to what > we want. And if you are overseas reading this, then I want you to know > - even though we have the choice, and I assure you most of us do > vote....... it seldom turns out the way we hope. >
I couldn't agree with you more! I'm an American living in the U.K. and have been for a little over 17 years now. The agenda of which you speak is, perhaps, worse than you think. I'm going to reveal something now that will anger a very powerful man- behind-the-scenes in America. He's the head of Psychological Operations (Psy-Ops) for the U.S. Army and his name is Col. Michael Aquino. Don't bother looking him up on Wiipedia, as he always ensures there is NO entry for him there. Although he is referred to in the article on 'The Temple of Set', which is an offshoot of Anton LaVey's 'Church of Satan'. Aquino didn't feel LaVey was taking it as seriously as he should and decided to create his own church--one that took the role of 'the necessary evil' to the fullest extent possible. The exorcism that took place in St. Louis, which became the basis for the film 'The Exorcist', is Aquino's greatest victory. What I mean by that is that all the furniture that was in the room where that exorcism took place (in the Alexian Brothers Hospital) is locked away in a room at Scott AFB in Illinois. Aquino has the key to that room and intends on using that furniture as a psychic link to the entity that possessed the young boy (in the film it was a young girl, in reality it was a young boy--I could give more information on him, but I respect the fact that he wants anonimity!). That entity named itself as Satan and the Jesuit priests were NEVER able to exorcise the entity from the boy. In the end, the Archangel Michael entered the boy and cast out the possessing entity within 20 seconds. The Church was powerless, but Michael prevailed. Aquino wants to create the Antichrist and wants to use the furniture in that room as a link to the entity (as I said, self-proclaimed as Satan himself) and use it to impregnate some unsuspecting woman (probalby through a in-vitro fertilisation offered by a clinic run by people who are members of the Temple of Set) resulting in her giving birth to 'The Antichrist'. While all this may sem far-fetched, it is, nevertheless, what Aquino wants to do. My stating it plainly here puts me at great risk; however, I have already protected myself from Aquino's 'magical' attacks in such a way that he would have to die before he had the ability to harm me. This, of course, does not protect me from material world attacks; although, I think his main reaction would simply be to deny what I say and leave it at that. The U.S. government trusts Aquino, yet he is, potentially, far more of an enemy to the US than Osama Bin Laden ever was. It was Aquino who suggested 'Water Boarding' to be used at Guantanamo Bay. There is no person more evil in the U.S. than him. I think it will be less than a week before he finds this post, as he has people who scan the Internet on a daily basis for information regarding him. He's paranoid and not without reason. Anyway, it ought to be interesting if he picks up on me 'outing' him. I'll let people here know, if anything strange happens...if I can. As I said, I think his reaction will simply be 'no reaction' because the people that read this are in no position to prevent him from acting. Since we pose no real threat, there's no sense in him calling attention to himself by reacting to this. Nevertheless, he is not the most mentally stable person in the world and is absolutely hell-bent on his mission to bring as much evil into the world as is humanly possible. I've exposed him, now, but I don't imagine that THAT will make much of a difference. Time will tell! ;-) > On Oct 7, 9:44 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 4, 4:01 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > When I hear that phrase, I'm reminded of McCarthy, determining from > > > congressional committee whether or not someone was properly American. > > > Apparently, being an artist, musician, philosopher, or wanting to > > > implement > > > social platforms to help the less fortunate were all considered such. > > > > Allan said that he had become un-American due to losing his ability to > > > drive. I'd like to hear you flesh that out some more, Allan, and then I'd > > > like to get some feedback from everyone what they think it means to be > > > American, or UN as the case may be. > > > Funnily enough, it's a topic I cover in my book when I address America > > in particular. One of the points I raised is that ther are two > > obvious ways of being American: > > 1) if you were born there > > 2) if you become a naturalised citizen as per the constitutional > > process > > > There are many immigrants, though, who leave their homeland for > > various reasons and come to America in the hopes of fulfilling the > > 'American Dream' like countless immigrants before them: the ability to > > eke out a better life for themselves and, perhaps, their families. > > These immigrants are, arguably, more 'American' in their hearts than > > many naturally born citizens, many of whom have become embittered by > > life in America not living up to its promise. America is founded on > > allowing immigration and building itself up by welcoming those who > > come from the rest of the planet. If America ever stops or limits > > immigration, it becomes un-American itself. The differences between > > people are humanity's greatest strength; therefore, a melting pot > > ought to be a strong nation. Yet there are still a minority of bigots > > who would have you believe that, unless you are White Anglo-Saxon > > Protestants, you are not American;thus, even the Native Americans are, > > by that rule, un-American. The falsity of their premiss is obvious. > > If anyone starts making claims about who is American and who is not > > other than by the two scenarios I stated above, they are bigots and > > are a danger to America and TRUE American values and ought to be > > weeded out. The Bush family and the Cheney family are cases in > > point. Their membership in the remains of 'The Knights of the Golden > > Circle' is evidence that they are, in fact, bigots in disguise. One > > of the offshoots of 'The Knights of the Golden Circle' was the Kuklos > > Clan, which, by corruption became the Ku Klux Klan. 'Kuklos' is Greek > > for 'circle' and that is why the offshoot called itself the 'Kuklos > > Clan'. Jesse James and William Quantrill were old members of this > > 'Knights of the Golden Circle' group. Their original concept was to > > conquer the West Indies and Central America and annex the entire lot > > as new Slave States. John Wilkes Booth was also a member, thus his > > famous line of 'Sic Semper Tyrannis' after assassinating Lincoln, > > implying that Lincoln was a tyrant because he stood against the > > increase of slave states. > > Enough rant! I think I've made my point. Bigots who oppose people > > because of petty differences like the relative amount of melanin in a > > person's skin are un-American. If you oppose immigration simply > > because you dont want 'foreigners' in America, you've lost the > > American plot. Remember the Statue of Liberty and Emma Lazarus' > > words: Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to > > breathe free. THAT is what America stands for.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
