That is the strange thing it gets rid of the lingering smells.. how,, no idea.. Allan
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > I must admit to being puzzled by such a product. Personaly I like my hads > to smell like chili after makeing a curry! > > On Thursday, 6 December 2012 08:15:06 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: >> >> it is not for cleaning hands ,, it just gets rid of smell that you >> can not get rid of no matter how much you wash.. you just wash after >> youor hands are clean,, then the smell is gone. >> Allan >> >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:27 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hm, I have never thought of using a steel soap bar for cleaning my >> > hands. I >> > use it occasionally for my pots and pans. And for the more difficult >> > dirt on >> > my hands I use a pumice stone or lemon. And more and more often I wear >> > gloves or buy frozen and precut garlic and onion. But thanks for the >> > tip. >> > I'm sure that one day I'll make use of it. Why not steel instead of >> > stone, >> > you're right. >> > >> > >> > On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:54:42 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote: >> >> >> >> Well actually Gabby I have this stainless steel soap bar used for >> >> getting rid of ordure off your hands things like onion, Garlic ,, >> >> any strong ordure ,, just tried it on the epoxy smell left over from >> >> fixing my maxi egg coddler. >> >> >> >> now one of the greatest mysteries of the universe,, how does it work? >> >> Allan >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > The pointlessness of the points' business. Like Lee, I find the God >> >> > concept >> >> > much more to the point. :) >> >> > >> >> > I don't follow Lee's sequencing model - first spirit, then matter - >> >> > though. >> >> > This sounds very man-made to me. ;) >> >> > >> >> > As for the storytelling aspect, yes, the Chronos story is much more >> >> > vivid >> >> > than the "God created (x) and saw it was good" story. That's true. >> >> > But >> >> > the >> >> > children are less likely to have bad dreams at night. Which is really >> >> > good. >> >> > >> >> > Sorry, Allan, I got carried away. What were you talking about? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2012/12/4 Allan H <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> a series of creation is at best a wild guess with no supporting >> >> >> evidence.. >> >> >> Allan >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > You can pinpoint the beginning of this universe but not that of >> >> >> > Creation with its series of universes. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Allan H <[email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> That is not true the beginning can be pretty much pinpointed .. >> >> >> >> as >> >> >> >> for >> >> >> >> parallel universes that is just a wild guess with nothing to >> >> >> >> support >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> other than it sounds good. There is more evidence supporting the >> >> >> >> spiritual >> >> >> >> realm than parallel universes >> >> >> >> Allan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 4, 2012 2:26 PM, "RP Singh" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> In my view there is no beginning to creation. There is beginning >> >> >> >>> and >> >> >> >>> end to universes There are infinite no. of universes in parallel >> >> >> >>> and >> >> >> >>> continuously many universes are being born and many are dying , >> >> >> >>> but >> >> >> >>> Creation which includes infinite universes in eternal time , >> >> >> >>> just >> >> >> >>> like >> >> >> >>> the Spirit, is without beginning and without end. The difference >> >> >> >>> is >> >> >> >>> that the nature of creation is dualistic and the Spirit is >> >> >> >>> non-dual. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lee Douglas >> >> >> >>> <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> > Hello Andrew, >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Heh I can envisage many things, but alas many of them are not >> >> >> >>> > true. >> >> >> >>> > I >> >> >> >>> > distinguish between two things, matter and spirit. Mattter is >> >> >> >>> > all >> >> >> >>> > that >> >> >> >>> > is >> >> >> >>> > physical, which includes physical 'matter' and also energy. >> >> >> >>> > To >> >> >> >>> > me >> >> >> >>> > there >> >> >> >>> > is >> >> >> >>> > no paradox of who created the creator. Before the begining >> >> >> >>> > there >> >> >> >>> > was >> >> >> >>> > only >> >> >> >>> > God, God in spirit, and God created the creation out of the >> >> >> >>> > spirt >> >> >> >>> > of >> >> >> >>> > God. >> >> >> >>> > That is all matter comes from spirit. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > On Friday, 30 November 2012 18:32:43 UTC, andrew vecsey wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> Lee, I can see where all matter has to have an energy >> >> >> >>> >> component >> >> >> >>> >> to >> >> >> >>> >> it >> >> >> >>> >> because matter is manifested as atoms which have motion in >> >> >> >>> >> them. >> >> >> >>> >> But I >> >> >> >>> >> could >> >> >> >>> >> also envision pure motion without involving any atoms...like >> >> >> >>> >> a >> >> >> >>> >> vibration in >> >> >> >>> >> the fabric of space, >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> On Friday, November 30, 2012 5:53:26 PM UTC+1, Lee Douglas >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> Heh except of course that when it comes right down to >> >> >> >>> >>> it.energy >> >> >> >>> >>> is >> >> >> >>> >>> matter >> >> >> >>> >>> and matter is energy. >> >> >> >>> >>> On Friday, 30 November 2012 11:22:14 UTC, andrew vecsey >> >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> The paradoxical dilemma of who created the creator can be >> >> >> >>> >>>> circumnavigated by the possibility that the original >> >> >> >>> >>>> creator >> >> >> >>> >>>> was >> >> >> >>> >>>> not >> >> >> >>> >>>> matter, >> >> >> >>> >>>> but energy. Just like thinking of anything is much faster >> >> >> >>> >>>> and >> >> >> >>> >>>> much >> >> >> >>> >>>> easier >> >> >> >>> >>>> than building it, it becomes conceivable that energy >> >> >> >>> >>>> patterns >> >> >> >>> >>>> could >> >> >> >>> >>>> have >> >> >> >>> >>>> evolved in a random chance way and finely tuned by >> >> >> >>> >>>> selective >> >> >> >>> >>>> processes to >> >> >> >>> >>>> reach intelligence similar to how most scientists believe >> >> >> >>> >>>> that >> >> >> >>> >>>> patterns of >> >> >> >>> >>>> atoms and molecules evolved to form intelligent life. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Energy patterns could have evolved to a point that they >> >> >> >>> >>>> manipulated >> >> >> >>> >>>> atoms to desired patterns and forms to code the information >> >> >> >>> >>>> required >> >> >> >>> >>>> for >> >> >> >>> >>>> life and to allow them to evolve on their own to complex >> >> >> >>> >>>> intelligent >> >> >> >>> >>>> beings >> >> >> >>> >>>> able to wonder at and eventually to solve the riddle of >> >> >> >>> >>>> where >> >> >> >>> >>>> they >> >> >> >>> >>>> came >> >> >> >>> >>>> from, where they are going and why they are alive. Meaning >> >> >> >>> >>>> and >> >> >> >>> >>>> purpose could >> >> >> >>> >>>> then be given to our fleeting moment of existence. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:55:05 PM UTC+1, archytas >> >> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> ....... All we have in respect of this is to posit >> >> >> >>> >>>>> creation, begging the question of what created that in an >> >> >> >>> >>>>> infinite >> >> >> >>> >>>>> regress. .....We might get to an intelligent state in >> >> >> >>> >>>>> which >> >> >> >>> >>>>> creation >> >> >> >>> >>>>> myths are replaced by something more plausible and Truth >> >> >> >>> >>>>> comes >> >> >> >>> >>>>> closer. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 29 Nov, 01:41, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Neil , even after re-transposition how long could the >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > brain >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > live >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > --1000 years , 10000years or maybe as long as the >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > universe >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > ,but >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > ultimately it will die or be destroyed at the end - time >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > of >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > the >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > universe. What survives is the Truth behind life and >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > nothing >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > else. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM, archytas >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > What survives is the gene - subject to mutations etc. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > We >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > are >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > already >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > 'Borg' in the sense of mass assimilation. One's mind >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > could >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > be >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > transposed to another substrate (nearish future) - our >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > bodies >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > are >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > currently replaced every 5 years or so- and the new >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > substrate >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > could >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > have nanobots that would allow minds to outlive Lee's >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > 'hope'. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > Such >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > substrated minds might link in super-intelligence and >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > be >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > able to >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > re- >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > transfer into more human-like bodies they learned to >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > make. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > This >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > would >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > be a time beyond singularity. We don't know what such >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > intelligence >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > might invent or even discover - perhaps such >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > intelligence >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > would >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > discover we are not as alone as we think. Being human >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > or >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > human >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > being >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > might be as irrelevant as a mitochondria wanting to >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > live >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > free >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > again. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > We might be free of the tiny machines (genes) so much >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > part >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > of >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > our >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > behaviour now. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > On 28 Nov, 14:40, Allan H <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> T9 grrrrrrr >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> Allan >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> On Nov 28, 2012 11:38 AM, "gabbydott" >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > Ah! That's the extended version of 'possibly maybe' >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > then >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > (my >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > grammar and >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > spelling checker suggests 10 instead of 'then' >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > though)! >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > :) >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > 2012/11/28 James <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> I am an aspect of what was, is, and will be, >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> coextensively. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> Maybe. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> On 11/27/2012 2:28 AM, RP Singh wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> immortality >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> and the >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> readiness to believe in an after-life or >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> re-birth. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> It >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> is an >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> off-shoot of >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> the instinct for survival. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> -- >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> -- >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > -- >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > -- >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > -- >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> ( >> >> >> ) >> >> >> |_D Allan >> >> >> >> >> >> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I am a Natural Airgunner - >> >> >> >> >> >> Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ( >> >> ) >> >> |_D Allan >> >> >> >> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. >> >> >> >> >> >> I am a Natural Airgunner - >> >> >> >> Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> ( >> ) >> |_D Allan >> >> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. >> >> >> I am a Natural Airgunner - >> >> Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. > > -- > > > -- ( ) |_D Allan Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. I am a Natural Airgunner - Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. --
