I don't understand your argument , but one thing is sure that I have never claimed to have had visions. I have always believed in an undual God , Nature or Atman which by my definition transcends awareness or to be blunt is unconscious. I know you have never read my posts carefully and thus your confusion regarding my statements and beliefs.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry RP heard that discussion before over a coffee table in Florida > some `25 years ago and the person laying forth the argument is a > devote atheist argument and not new. simple one way to explain on > going life and expanding knowledge,, one used by atheist.. > Now you are claiming that atheist believe in God.. verry confusing.. > Allan > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:36 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> Allan , an atheist is a person who doesn't believe in intelligent >> design. God and Nature are one and the same. Merry Christmas to you ! >> >> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: >>> you are a very confusing person RP ..one moment you claim to be >>> enlightened with visions and deep spiritual convictions and here you >>> are desperately trying to prove you are an atheist,, and atheism is >>> acceptable .. or are you just a confused puppy not knowing where to >>> turn? >>> Have a good holiday >>> Allan >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:29 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Instead of believing in an Intelligent designer if we believe that >>>> Nature itself is inherently intelligent and things move on with an >>>> intelligent purpose , which though not easily recognizable as such, is >>>> in any case true may well be within your belief system , Neil. In >>>> spite of mayhem caused by natural disasters life still moves on and >>>> the fact that Nature will one day destroy all life and the universe >>>> doesn't negate its intelligence. Growth doesn't move forward >>>> continuously but after a certain stage decay starts creeping in. >>>> Everything is born , grows , and dies and this is true for all >>>> manifestations of Nature and doesn't negate its intelligent design. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:57 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I tend to agree RP, though I don't stretch to an intelligent designer >>>>> other than as a possibility. We might be approaching a tipping point >>>>> on the reason for existence. >>>>> >>>>> On 24 Dec, 18:29, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> The systematic way in which this body is formed and works shows that >>>>>> there >>>>>> is Intelligence in Nature and we won't be far wrong if we call it >>>>>> Intelligent design. That which appears to be random choice is actually a >>>>>> high level of Intelligence. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ( >>> ) >>> |_D Allan >>> >>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. >>> >>> Of course I talk to myself, >>> Sometimes I need expert advice.. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> > > > > -- > ( > ) > |_D Allan > > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. > > Of course I talk to myself, > Sometimes I need expert advice.. > > -- > > > --
