Mostly temperament is made up of habits , Neil, you change them and the personality changes.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > Biology has changing temperament as very difficult RP. I've never thought > much of shifting heavy stones about for science or religion. The point of > anthropology for me is to work out just how stone age we remain. Science > wins hands down for me against religion of any kind, but only up to a > point. There's a lot of stuff that isn't science that has fairytales - > sort of basic fictions aimed more at ways if living rather than the > empirical adequacy of science. Freud's 'depressive' rather than > 'paranoid-schizoid' position to view the world is one example - and rather > like RP's. > > The problem that arises for me in most religion is lack of critical > fellowship and the presence of gooey nodding donkey agreement as proof. I > regularly meet people who have read even less of the Bible than me saying > it is wonderful. I am not sure the real fairytales of religion are made > clear at all in the way they are examined in science. > > > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 6:33:31 PM UTC, facilitator wrote: >> >> Good point RP. So we'll just leave it at that, criticism. >> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
