Neil, admitted that heredity and environment play a big role in the making of our feelings and thought processes , yet conscious effort made with the correct understanding can change the way of our habitual actions and reactions. Freud, with his psycho-analysis successfully treated many neurotics and I think that we can get out of our habitual emotions and thinking if we make conscious effort in the right direction.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:11 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > Much sympathy with the view RP, though genetics-epigenetics plays a big > role in such as aggression. I think Tony gets to a lot of the art issues. > Habit has chronic effects. > > > On Friday, November 14, 2014 4:19:50 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >> >> We are prone to keep certain feelings in our heart as a response to >> others' behavior , it is habitual to us and if we change this habit >> gradually by removing such reactions , our behavior will change. The way we >> feel and think governs the way we act , our temperament will change if we >> change this habitual thinking and emotions. >> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:10 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Mostly temperament is made up of habits , Neil, you change them and the >>> personality changes. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Biology has changing temperament as very difficult RP. I've never >>>> thought much of shifting heavy stones about for science or religion. The >>>> point of anthropology for me is to work out just how stone age we remain. >>>> Science wins hands down for me against religion of any kind, but only up to >>>> a point. There's a lot of stuff that isn't science that has fairytales - >>>> sort of basic fictions aimed more at ways if living rather than the >>>> empirical adequacy of science. Freud's 'depressive' rather than >>>> 'paranoid-schizoid' position to view the world is one example - and rather >>>> like RP's. >>>> >>>> The problem that arises for me in most religion is lack of critical >>>> fellowship and the presence of gooey nodding donkey agreement as proof. I >>>> regularly meet people who have read even less of the Bible than me saying >>>> it is wonderful. I am not sure the real fairytales of religion are made >>>> clear at all in the way they are examined in science. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 6:33:31 PM UTC, facilitator wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Good point RP. So we'll just leave it at that, criticism. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
