Faraday gave a lecture in Warrington - but neglected to burn the town to the ground. Otherwise my family might have stayed in Scotland and I would have had a vote to separate from England and the Queen. Should the Queen die, we all get Charlied here. My dad's dad, a union firebrand, never spoke a rational word and was Irish and mostly drunk. He would have had no time for Peglegida either. We are Scot's on Dad's mother's side and distantly Jewish on Mum's.
British cops have been armed with more tasers to combat the assault rifle threat. Gabby's recent love-trust everyone will get cuddly if only you love yourself might be a more powerful military option. Is it cheaper Gabbs? That would convince the Tories. On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 10:53:48 PM UTC, Gabby wrote: > > Je suis un Charlie would marke the difference. > > Am Freitag, 16. Januar 2015 17:00:53 UTC+1 schrieb archytas: >> >> We wouldn't make that distinction in English. I am Warringtonian or a >> Warringtonian could be held to have different meanings - the first perhaps >> a person reflecting Warrington, the latter just some poor sod unfortunate >> enough to be born or live in the dump. Most of it makes that rabbit hutch >> you once put me in a desirable residence. One couldn't distinguish the >> meaning on grammar - it would all be in tone. Je suis charlie is beginning >> to feel as 'constructed' as the JFK myth to me. >> >> On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 9:54:02 PM UTC, Gabby wrote: >>> >>> Both forms are correct if I say them and both wrong if JFK had meant >>> them non-politically. Ich bin Berliner translates I am (from/somehow >>> connected to) Berlin, and Ich bin ein Berliner translates I am a Berliner. >>> >>> Am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 18:44:00 UTC+1 schrieb archytas: >>>> >>>> I'm with the first line Allan. I'd guess the correct German would be >>>> Ich bin Berliner rather than what JFK said. I wouldn't use my time >>>> machine >>>> to go back and stop the guy to ensure we didn't have to 'put up with' >>>> Gabby. Of course, if Gladstone had had his way, your Confederate sabre >>>> would have ended up on the winning side until the Brits, Russians and >>>> French took over and divided up the US. >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 15 January 2015 08:51:16 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes you are correct almost. The reason there is the on going problems >>>>> is conservitive cowards that are afraid to stand up for anything just so >>>>> the don't disturb their pitiful realities. >>>>> June 26 1963 the news headlines read. "Ich bin ein Berliner" the >>>>> terrorism of soviet communism was stood up to. >>>>> Today i am called names cursed at .. if the attitude displayed by >>>>> gabby was taken in 1963.. where would Gabby be.. would we even know her? >>>>> What am I listening to. >>>>> Incedently ww2 was cemented into action in 1919 with the treaty people >>>>> were forced to sign that ended ww1.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>>>> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres >>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: archytas <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 4:29 AM >>>>> Subject: Mind's Eye So what's wrong with je suis charlie? >>>>> >>>>> Killing cartoonists clearly can't be allowed. There is no absolute >>>>> authority for jihad, crusades or lacking a self-depreciating sense of >>>>> humour prepared to rip loved ones from the lives of relatives and >>>>> friends. >>>>> The most common 'cause' of killing and war in primitive societies is >>>>> revenge, generally pretty dumb. >>>>> >>>>> On the day Charlie Hebdo was struck, Boko Haram was doing much worse >>>>> in Nigeria and 2000 died. Yemen was pasted again. 25 million or so have >>>>> died in wars after WW2 and any number of people have had peaceful lives >>>>> destroyed by various forms of imperialism. We understand revenge films >>>>> where the child not slaughtered by Barbarians grows to destroy them. >>>>> There >>>>> are at least questions we should be asking on whether fundamentalist >>>>> Islam >>>>> is radicalising terrorists, or the various imperialisms and the >>>>> conditions >>>>> these create in countries kept poor and run by installed despots. >>>>> >>>>> Institutional religion is no use to me and I detest the hostility of >>>>> those believers who would have me respect belief in superstition,clearly >>>>> false history, varieties of justified sexism, racism, apartheid and >>>>> selfish >>>>> chosen-peopleism. This extends far beyond religion and to false ideas >>>>> that >>>>> the Greek Enlightenment was the zenith of civilisation. This was a >>>>> sexist, >>>>> racist, slave economy. Western democratic free trade liberalism is such >>>>> a >>>>> lie as to be merely another control fraud, not the end of history. >>>>> >>>>> There is little clarity. We stand as Charlie for free speech, yet do >>>>> nothing against indecent Saudi floggings and beheadings. We have never >>>>> produced democratic foreign policy, population control or sustained >>>>> peace. >>>>> Now we are arresting people protesting publicly against Charlie, >>>>> somewhat >>>>> contradictory to say the least. All that seems clear is that we are all >>>>> Charleys, without much of a system to openly discuss what is wrong, >>>>> leaving >>>>> tyranny anywhere a threat to freedom everywhere. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
