Very cunning RP - as ever. On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 6:19:43 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: > > Thanks Neil. I just don't seem to elaborate , it is in the course of the > discussions that the elaborations come out. > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:27 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is rather similar to the maths of the other side of big bang RP. >> Assuming a big crunch after our expansion, which would lead to another big >> bang, what survives from this to the next? Quantum fluctuation was the >> answer in the maths, mind in your suggestion here. Neil Turok was a name >> in the papers I read, but ideas producing no answers seems the name of the >> game. More recently I've seen suggestions big bangs create another >> universe with time going 'backwards', known as the 'more than one future' >> approach. Others suggest biggle bang itself is fictional and arises from >> religious creationism we haven't managed to extirpate from our thinking - >> thus we should be thinking 'closer to home' on the constructors in a new >> thermodynamics of what pathways are possible and not. Examples of these >> constructors are factories and catalysts. Factories may be those familiar >> to us or ribosomes. Catalysts are more complex than the stuff of school >> chemistry. >> >> Slime moulds have been interesting me recently. These are single-celled >> 'brainless' organisms we can only safely describe as neither plant nor >> animal. Yet they form networks as complex are our railway systems. We >> don't really know how they have the intelligence to search for food. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwKuFREOgmo >> >> Great stuff RP - but can you unwind it a bit more? In another sense, >> both of us have been rather biologically deterministic on 'brain producing >> mind' in human psychology. >> >> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:31:10 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>> >>> The entire creation is predetermined , it is history.Before the big bang >>> the history existed in the form of an idea in the singularity. With the >>> big bang the history started manifesting itself as creation It is simply >>> the unmanifest which is manifesting. And hence the evolution of the >>> universe is just the mind which is manifesting itself. >>> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
