Am still trying to figure out you predestiny theory. To me it sounds like nothing more than someone trying to justify improper activites by blaming predestiny instead of taking responsibility. You said the samething years ago blaming your beliefs.
Nice to read you here again maybe some of the other oldtimers will return also. تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others -----Original Message----- From: archytas <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:53 PM Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: History Very cunning RP - as ever. On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 6:19:43 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: > > Thanks Neil. I just don't seem to elaborate , it is in the course of the > discussions that the elaborations come out. > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:27 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is rather similar to the maths of the other side of big bang RP. >> Assuming a big crunch after our expansion, which would lead to another big >> bang, what survives from this to the next? Quantum fluctuation was the >> answer in the maths, mind in your suggestion here. Neil Turok was a name >> in the papers I read, but ideas producing no answers seems the name of the >> game. More recently I've seen suggestions big bangs create another >> universe with time going 'backwards', known as the 'more than one future' >> approach. Others suggest biggle bang itself is fictional and arises from >> religious creationism we haven't managed to extirpate from our thinking - >> thus we should be thinking 'closer to home' on the constructors in a new >> thermodynamics of what pathways are possible and not. Examples of these >> constructors are factories and catalysts. Factories may be those familiar >> to us or ribosomes. Catalysts are more complex than the stuff of school >> chemistry. >> >> Slime moulds have been interesting me recently. These are single-celled >> 'brainless' organisms we can only safely describe as neither plant nor >> animal. Yet they form networks as complex are our railway systems. We >> don't really know how they have the intelligence to search for food. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwKuFREOgmo >> >> Great stuff RP - but can you unwind it a bit more? In another sense, >> both of us have been rather biologically deterministic on 'brain producing >> mind' in human psychology. >> >> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:31:10 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>> >>> The entire creation is predetermined , it is history.Before the big bang >>> the history existed in the form of an idea in the singularity. With the >>> big bang the history started manifesting itself as creation It is simply >>> the unmanifest which is manifesting. And hence the evolution of the >>> universe is just the mind which is manifesting itself. >>> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
