Allan, would you care to tell me how the universe is part of God's being? Is this not some sort of bookish ranting?
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:11 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > As for omnipotent is is often used i do not even see it in relationship > with the uncreated God. Although used it just does not fit.. Why? God is > not seperate from the universe. The universe is only part of God's being. > > تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين > Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres > Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others > > -----Original Message----- > From: RP Singh <[email protected]> > To: Minds Eye <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 1:50 PM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: History > > Allan , man is free to do just as he wants to , but God being omnipotent > has to sanction it beforehand , and that is what is predetermined , the > will of God over and above the will of man. > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am still trying to figure out you predestiny theory. To me it sounds >> like nothing more than someone trying to justify improper activites by >> blaming predestiny instead of taking responsibility. >> You said the samething years ago blaming your beliefs. >> >> Nice to read you here again maybe some of the other oldtimers will >> return also. >> >> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres >> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: archytas <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:53 PM >> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: History >> >> Very cunning RP - as ever. >> >> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 6:19:43 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Neil. I just don't seem to elaborate , it is in the course of the >>> discussions that the elaborations come out. >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:27 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This is rather similar to the maths of the other side of big bang RP. >>>> Assuming a big crunch after our expansion, which would lead to another big >>>> bang, what survives from this to the next? Quantum fluctuation was the >>>> answer in the maths, mind in your suggestion here. Neil Turok was a name >>>> in the papers I read, but ideas producing no answers seems the name of the >>>> game. More recently I've seen suggestions big bangs create another >>>> universe with time going 'backwards', known as the 'more than one future' >>>> approach. Others suggest biggle bang itself is fictional and arises from >>>> religious creationism we haven't managed to extirpate from our thinking - >>>> thus we should be thinking 'closer to home' on the constructors in a new >>>> thermodynamics of what pathways are possible and not. Examples of these >>>> constructors are factories and catalysts. Factories may be those familiar >>>> to us or ribosomes. Catalysts are more complex than the stuff of school >>>> chemistry. >>>> >>>> Slime moulds have been interesting me recently. These are >>>> single-celled 'brainless' organisms we can only safely describe as neither >>>> plant nor animal. Yet they form networks as complex are our railway >>>> systems. We don't really know how they have the intelligence to search for >>>> food. >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwKuFREOgmo >>>> >>>> Great stuff RP - but can you unwind it a bit more? In another sense, >>>> both of us have been rather biologically deterministic on 'brain producing >>>> mind' in human psychology. >>>> >>>> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:31:10 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The entire creation is predetermined , it is history.Before the big >>>>> bang the history existed in the form of an idea in the singularity. With >>>>> the big bang the history started manifesting itself as creation It is >>>>> simply the unmanifest which is manifesting. And hence the evolution of the >>>>> universe is just the mind which is manifesting itself. >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
