Consciousness is always working with events that have passed ans so is ahead of time. As for walls, on tends to bounce off their electro-magnetic force - the same force that keeps most of our feet on the ground. Float over for cheese and biscuits any time, preferably yesterday.
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 10:01:27 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: > > Time is a companion that travels with us every moment never to return > again and should be cherished. > > تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين > Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres > Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others > > -----Original Message----- > From: archytas <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 9:34 PM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: History > > That sums it up well RP. I guess we are always living outside immediate > time in consciousness of the conscious kind. > > On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:34:08 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >> >> Conscious thinking leaves a greater imprint than unconscious thinking. >> Controls exercised by conscious will are many times more powerful than >> thinking on an unconscious level. To change our nature it is better to make >> conscious effort. >> It is through our nature that all thoughts and actions arise , though it >> is known that even the will to change arises from our nature and is innate >> in us. Yet we have to strive such is the paradox. >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:21 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I get that bit RP. In another sense one might wonder on decisions being >>> made unconsciously long before we rationalise them, bringing up other >>> questions on where free will lies, even what has it. Your scheme leaves >>> plenty of room for it in the general sense. In the ants I used to study, >>> much behaviour is controlled by 'smells'. Human behaviour in cultures can >>> look very similar. Leadership rarely allows free will in followers other >>> than to follow. >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 00:36:55 UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>>> >>>> Choice is there where you can do otherwise , Neil. God has to do what >>>> he does and hence no choice. We conscious beings are always doubtful , to >>>> do this or that , the more confident we are, the less hesitant even if >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:43 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> God might need that touch of malevolence to have his own free will - >>>>> once totally rational and good you just have to do the right thing. RP >>>>> has >>>>> hit his version will a piece of three by two to evade this issue - so we >>>>> are like those toys that come out to play at night only 24/7. Both Tony >>>>> and RP have that touch of the Lords of Cosmic Jest about them too. >>>>> >>>>> Multiverse theory arose when a humanities undergraduate overheard a >>>>> drunken conversation between Wheeler and Everitt on why their sums never >>>>> added up. They were really talking about normalisation and >>>>> re-normalisation, but if all you knew about reality was Jane Eyre and >>>>> that >>>>> the Greeks and Romans were the good guys of history, some dumb joke about >>>>> multiple universes with no need to do complex maths is what you'd >>>>> remember >>>>> - particularly if they had enough beer to offer you a few. Myriad >>>>> universes, even in this dud non-theory, are created every time we make a >>>>> tiny measurement, identical to this universe except for the measurement. >>>>> The god of this lot would be too busy to laugh at we jesters, clowns and >>>>> mug punters and not know which jar to look in. The humanities graduate >>>>> as >>>>> pretty, so John and Hugh spun a long yarn. Eventually it became string >>>>> theory and Pat had god lodged in Kaliber Yawn space, where beer is >>>>> alcohol >>>>> free. >>>>> >>>>> Me? I'm off to play with the unicorns at the bottom of Allan's >>>>> garden. They are atheists to a man-jack. With all that horn, they know >>>>> any generous omnipotent being would have created female unicorns too. >>>>> Fetch a flask out Allan, I gave mine to some cold Pixies on the way from >>>>> Schipol. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, 19 January 2015 23:38:16 UTC, facilitator wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Tough old world Wonder if the god in Tony's picture ever thougt to >>>>>> ask what the people not listening think? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Doesn't need to know. Why is the universe so big? One scenario is >>>>>> that all of these possibilities are being played out right now in an >>>>>> almost >>>>>> infinite number of worlds. Each world have similar enough Bio-form to >>>>>> be a >>>>>> blueprint for the next. That's how I would do it if I were playing God. >>>>>> >>>>>> Put them in a jar, shake it up, and see if they fight. I am of course >>>>>> impugning a degree of maliciousness, but who has the moral full house >>>>>> against two of a kind? >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
