Animals have a great abillity to escape. I tend to keep Joey away from children as they do not have full control ofor know their muscle strenght.. joey's recommends keeping kids away ..she is cute and cuddlt at same time can be hurt very easily.. her bones though strong are not very big.
تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others -----Original Message----- From: archytas <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 7:25 AM Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Consciousness I see kids being very cruel to animals and themselves as well RP. I agree on the demons and believe them real in some ways - clearly in effect. And the insanity. On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 11:54:36 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote: > > Mostly we don't even think of awareness , it is just taken for granted. > Little children don't know the term but interact with others and know > automatically what is conscious and what is not. They can easily break > their toys but not their pups , they are ever so affectionate with the > living and cruel with the inanimate. If we continue to think of ourselves > as spirits the confusion will remain , we must think of ourselves as > organisms and the First Cause as the Spirit. So we are all mortals and it > is only the Spirit which is immortal , then and then only can we have a > semblance of sanity. It does not take much to go beyond sanity , the > breaking point is very near. In many instances I can be called insane when > I talk of ridding ourselves of the demons and think about solutions as if > the governments of the world even know that I exist. > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:46 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> With the atoms or whatever particles we admit to, it's not so much >> whether they have awareness but that what we are aware of is less than what >> is going on. What then of human interactions! >> >> >> On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 10:38:03 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>> >>> I don't know , Allan , what is aware and what is not. I can know only >>> that I am aware and for the rest I can infer that they are so. Maybe even >>> atoms are aware. >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Why does a state of awareness have to be restricted to organìc matter >>>> RP? >>>> >>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>>> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres >>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: RP Singh <[email protected]> >>>> To: Minds Eye <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 4:09 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Consciousness >>>> >>>> I don't understand all this talk of consciousness as if it were an >>>> entity , to me consciousness is simply a state i.e. awareness , and what >>>> is >>>> aware is the organism. It is like a sweet which is pleasurable but is >>>> pleasure an entity , no it is not , it is simply a quality and the sweet >>>> is >>>> the entity. So the question is what is consciousness? It is a state of the >>>> organism like the dream-state , sleep-state and awake-state. And awareness >>>> is strongest in the awake-state of the organism and in the sleep-state >>>> awareness is very nominal. So what we are trying to define is a quality >>>> and >>>> not an entity , so how do you define a quality , can you define pain , >>>> pleasure , sweet , sour and such other abstract things , no you cannot! >>>> So as definitions go we can only say that consciousness is a state of >>>> awareness of an organism and is an attribute which can be understood and >>>> not defined. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:18 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's all true RP and part of what many of us are conscious of - >>>>> though I think governments beyond thinking. Whether we know what >>>>> consciousness is or not, we often talk of needed change in it. I'd go >>>>> for >>>>> creating something that removed us from grim material competition - but >>>>> some have it we would lose all motivation in such a state. >>>>> >>>>> We avoid the real morality, perhaps by talk of unattainable abstracts >>>>> like a definition of consciousness. Good start RP. Maybe Allan will >>>>> have >>>>> something to say once he's finished chewing his rock? I think we need to >>>>> go deep green on materials and far more compassionate spiritually. If >>>>> this >>>>> actually happened in our lifetimes we'd know consciousness can change. >>>>> Love is fine, but expecting it from horrible people is usually not a good >>>>> strategy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 1:18:35 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Neil , since we know that it is our biology which is acting out and >>>>>> that what we are doing it is the gogs which are working shouldn't we be >>>>>> more tolerant , think of ways and means to address questions of terror >>>>>> ,rage , etc. with a more humanitarian way than to meet violence with >>>>>> violence , shouldn't we meet hate with love and understanding knowing >>>>>> that >>>>>> our brethren know not what they are doing , shouldn't we be more >>>>>> compassionate , is retribution the only way , force the only answer , no >>>>>> Neil , our Governments must think of other options. >>>>>> When our children do wrong we try to help them by counselling because >>>>>> we love them , couldn't we do the same with others knowing them to be >>>>>> our >>>>>> ignorant brethren , couldn't there be some way to make them realize that >>>>>> their philosophy is wrong , their attitude wrong , we must try and seek >>>>>> alternatives otherwise this monster of terror will never die but rise a >>>>>> hundred times with each drop of bloodshed. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:37 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It could even be RP that some disaster in, say, 50 years, which a >>>>>>> little change now might help us avert, brings the end of humans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 12:57:09 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What would be there if there were no laws of nature --mayhem >>>>>>>> everywhere , chaos , destruction , anarchy. What if all laws fail >>>>>>>> ,annihilation--and it might be that the universe will end that way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:35 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Suppose there had been no consciousness and the entire world had >>>>>>>>> been there but all unconscious , what would be the Truth? Just death >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> nothing else. Consciousness is what makes life , a proof that there >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> something which exists , Existence itself and not death. Look at the >>>>>>>>> stars >>>>>>>>> , the solar system , if it had self-direction where would we be? It >>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>> obeys laws and that is the reason for order in the universe and not >>>>>>>>> chaos. >>>>>>>>> What would humanity have been if we were not bound by our nature , no >>>>>>>>> laws >>>>>>>>> of biology , psychology , etc. , no predictability , no comfort that >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>> would return to our homes at night ,no assurance that we would return >>>>>>>>> home >>>>>>>>> from work . Unpredictability is still there but it is minor , mostly >>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>> is satisfaction and assurance of well-being. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
