When god created the giraffe he was drunk indeed.  The sun itself is 
waiting for we roses to bloom.  I would struggle to play rugby in today's 
'go easy on the orange juice old boy' times.

On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 6:47:17 PM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote:
>
> The great ideas only come once the beer has blotted the noise up front, 
> old boy. Not blotto, mind you, just knocked the rough edges off. I'm 
> familiar with the black abyss that waits just a few footsteps beyond. 
> Bukowski's legacy is romantic, but living it wasn't, and I have no 
> intention of retracing his footsteps. 
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:11 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Norms are the means to achieve social action.  If norms can thrive and 
>> spread, they can also die out.  We do witness sudden and unexpected change 
>> of well-established patterns of behaviour. Smoking in public without asking 
>> for permission is quickly becoming unacceptable, and only a few years ago 
>> nobody would have worried about using gender-laden language. One would 
>> expect inefficient norms (such as discriminatory norms against women and 
>> minorities) to disappear more rapidly and with greater frequency than more 
>> efficient ones. However, inefficiency is not a sufficient condition for a 
>> norm's demise: instead, it is only a necessary condition. This can best be 
>> seen by the study of corruption. There are many examples, past and present, 
>> of uniformly corrupt societies. Corruption fosters huge social costs, but 
>> costs—even when they take a society to the brink of collapse—are not enough 
>> to generate an overhaul of the system (such as the current crisis).  We 
>> have long demonstrated that corruption can be an unstable equilibrium in a 
>> fixed population. In more realistic settings, in which the population is 
>> variable, a society can cycle between ‘honest’ and corrupt social norms, 
>> without a single stable state.
>>
>> So how do we achieve new norms?  Can we have norms within norms that 
>> allow/encourage difference and adaptation to change.  Biology does.  
>> Religion, away from fundamentalists does too.  RP rightly wants security.  
>> Gabby might be seen as in creative tension between the same page and 
>> radical deconstruction.  Facil between anarchism and moralism.   Allan owns 
>> the coffee machine so I have to listen.  Somewhere, individualism must come 
>> in - but as an ideology this probably fails.  Knowledge, if we could make 
>> it more understandable as Andrew has often ventured, would help, as would 
>> something like Bitcoin to break the normative control of money by banks.  
>> Molly and the light could change norms - I'm much more materialist.  Chris 
>> would seem to advocate beer, but has to explain how he is sober enough to 
>> have some great ideas.
>>
>> Tough question Allan and we should remember there are some norms we would 
>> resist by force.
>>
>> On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 8:22:12 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>
>>> Very true. 
>>>
>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres
>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 9:19 PM
>>> Subject: Mind's Eye Re: Norm
>>>
>>> Social norms can have positive benefits like welfare maximization and 
>>> new ones also emerge through time
>>>
>>> On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 8:05:53 PM UTC, archytas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Basic biology.
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 7:53:15 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Without devation  from the norm progress is not possible. 
>>>>>
>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>>> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres
>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to