I'm not quite so absurdist as Chris in his story above on truth, though 
I've had plenty of exasperations on it.  Koro and kuru might be 
interesting.  The first is a delusory affliction, sometimes in mass 
hysteria, that genital organs (the penis or female nipples) are 
disappearing into the body, the second a real disease that emerges from 
former cannibal practices (it has a long incubation period - the 
cannibalism is supposed to have stopped in 1960).  One of the 'cures' for 
koro is to get someone else to hang onto the actually non-receding bit.  So 
you see Chris, there is some truth.  If you think you have koro, no point 
in calling me.  Kuru is incurable, so the truth there is it ain't good to 
eat people.

Human susceptibility to delusion seems plain enough.  Quite a few students 
over the years have deluded themselves into thinking my story about koro 
isn't true.  Amazingly, on reference to Wikipedia, they believe it.  This, 
of course, is part of a longer strategy to get them to understand what 
'credibility' is - like the credibility of someone teaching from management 
textbooks as though they are true.  Managers, in these books, have 
responsibility to create reality for others.  If this is true, we can at 
least ask why they choose to inflict such a lousy one.

I guess most of us can spot that the guy chopping at his second head, 
believing it is me, yet putting himself in hospital, is deluded.  Gabby 
might be tempted to applaud, but I'm pretty sure she would try to take the 
axe away, if she had the chance.  This sort of delusion seems easy to spot, 
even though we don't have direct access to the deluded mind.  Yet if we can 
spot delusions such as this and the action of ophiocordyceps unilateralis, 
the ant deluding fungus (known as the zombie fungus) - should be not think 
on our susceptibility to delusions we are not spotting?  The deluded ants 
do not make a pretty picture in death 
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophiocordyceps_unilateralis

Tony's sculptures (are we there yet on the next batch, I ask as progress 
chaser on the production line?) have an illusory aspect - but any delusion 
created does seem facilitatory.  This great link he put up the other day 
gets closer to the kind of delusion that bugs me 
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEi9ZQrEjr8 - and I can easily imagine 
doing something like this on economics as the que sera sera bit.  You can 
imagine a burned-out village in the Congo and dead bodies, with a talk-over 
by some ghastly PR from Glencore on 'maximising profit opportunities', 
Greek kids going hungry as Christine Lagarde does standard IMF 
austerity-speak 5 years after the 'cure' has failed.  Groups of teenagers 
with their neat mobile phones in quasi-orgasmic rituals around them, cut 
with some poor sod trying to dig his child out of a landslide in the tin 
resource chain.  Various politicians with jawbs-groaf promises against a 
burning world.  The delusion is presumably that we can keep on as we are - 
but how it has come about and is spreading look intractable.  Musak might 
be a cut up version of Monty Python's 'Bright Side of Life'.

Delusions deny evidence (in the Nico Bento case there is a fascinating 
example of a supposedly 'sane' British court not believing their eyes and 
instead an 'expert' telling them what they were seeing in CCTV footage was 
illusory - though much more scary is the real experts were excluded), but 
this is actually fairly standard human reasoning.  We fit evidence in a 
world-view.  CSI is a great example - there are more clues in one episode 
than I had in a career.

The insanesteam economists have finally admitted they don't do science, but 
still claim they act like objective scientists - frankly a total delusion. 
 Yet they still hold sway.  Of course, I still know how to pretend to be a 
Christian.

And there are big questions on whether one's own objectivity is merely 
another delusion.  Evidence seems to be the answer, yet evidence systems 
turn out to be rhetorical, often with conflicting root metaphors and hidden 
drives.  Remember, most people fail school - so what faith should we have 
in the general capacity for argument?  It's tough - but what is our own 
delusion as a discussion group?   

On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:24:27 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> Ah delusion,  norm & money..  Oddly say a science program  today. 
> Money is a commonly agreed upon delusion  with agreed upon rules.  Alter 
> the rules the system crashes..   :-P 
> Left me wondering  at what is going happen because of the continued 
> manipulation of the rules of money .. Greed is a strange delusion. 
> It was a fasinating. 
> Then moved on to different  realities.. :-D 
>
> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres
> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: archytas <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 8:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Delusions
>
> Brilliant Chris.  'Truth is an arete', I once read.  I looked up 'arete' 
> in a French dictionary (the first e had a circumflex accent) finding the 
> useful word 'fish-hook'.  I tried Greek and realised it meant 'value'. 
>  Having read 100,000 words to discover this, the idea academics knew 
> anything about this stuff disappeared.
>
> There is no crown.  Gabby stole the jewels in some campaign to raise Allan 
> to common dust, apparently.  
>
> On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 6:48:45 PM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> It's times like this I'm quite glad I shook off the ModGod mantle. Heavy 
>> is the head that wears the crown. 
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Gabby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh come on, Allan! I am still waiting for your excuse back in the 
>>> religion thread! Don't avoid your responsibility there! And you better 
>>> don't expect any responsibility talking from the ModGods here...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to