I have a question.. If one day robots get some sort of moral autonomy..
Will they have same rights as is... Seeing they will have a clear knowledge
of their creators unlike us... Will we ever consider them an equal party in
our imaginary contract??
On Mar 9, 2015 1:28 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> That is very true,
>
> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Molly <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 8:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>
> Ultimately, whether a group "goes backwards" or forwards, succeeds or
> fails, depends on the membership. The quality of the dialogue has improved
> here lately with the return of a few members that were at one time
> interested in the quality of the conversation. Even when that quality was
> high, squabbles occurred and trolls came and went. It will be interesting
> to see what happens to the group, whether it slides back to viscous
> discourse or continues to improve. No behind the scenes covert
> manipulations will decide the fate. This group will fail or not because of
> what the members tolerate, respect, introduce, offer and create. No more no
> less. You can stack the administrators, change the engaged members. The
> tone and longevity of the dialogue is simply formulated by the daily words
> posted. No single person's manipulations (or select few that allow) will
> make or break it. Even if ME fails here, the members relate on more than
> one platform, and if the desire is to continue the conversation, whatever
> the tone, it will continue. Human resilience should never be underestimated.
>
> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 2:55:24 PM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>
>> Not me Francis is the proper group vicar. His knowledge and understanding
>> is so far beyond mine.. it is embarrassing.
>>
>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 7:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>
>> We have vicars not vacars my dear.  *You were the Information Manager, a
>> far more important role given the needed suppression of the project for
>> reasons of international security.  Does vicarious embarrassment need
>> batteries?  You not laughing will be tough to get to the top of the
>> newspile.  Though you are a giggle.  Allan is well aware of his real role.
>>  *
>>
>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 6:14:06 PM UTC, Gabby wrote:
>>
>> What about your "making" Allan your project manager of the moral compass?
>> Ich musste mich so fremdschämen! (It made me squirm with vacarious
>> embarrassment!) Did I tell Allan how he was made the circus clown while he
>> was thinking he was the director? No, i did not laugh.
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb archytas :
>>
>> I hardly expect you to whisper sweet nothings, even as Gabbsie Twirly.
>> You could be less Bulldog sometimes and just let the sleeping dog lie,
>> though the other side of this is to become the nodding donkey Allan
>> supposedly does not like.  Your high horse leaves a peculiar trail, given
>> rocking horse dung is so rare.  Nice people usually aren't, so I always
>> think you might be.  If you get my drift and understand I was genuinely
>> touched by you tagging me as the 'rabbit'.
>>
>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 4:16:48 PM UTC, Gabby wrote:
>>
>> Words can be seen as place holders if there is no meaning connected to
>> them. You insist your meaning is right, I insist my meaning is right,
>> doesn't lead us anywhere. That's why I made a suggestion you developed a
>> meaning repository of "soul" for us to be able to enter a meaningful
>> conversation with you instead of being confronted with what I perceive as
>> empty place holder interjections in an otherwise interesting thread
>> continuation.
>>
>> But you can twist, offend, insult, attack - fools and children are always
>> forgiven. My problem is that I take it serious what you are doing and
>> saying here. And I get my punishment. [ waving hello at RP :-) ]
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb :
>>
>> To me all " big girl " is saying is she is an adult and of female
>> gender.. nothing more.. unless may be grow up.  No different some one
>> telling me I am a big boy..
>>
>> But if i say the sun is shining Gabby is offended.. if she is offended i
>> will stop using it..
>>
>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Molly <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 4:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>
>> Also, I have to go with Gabby on this one. Calling her a big girl is
>> gender insensitive and demeaning.
>>
>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:27:40 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to find out why our big girl Gabby is so bothered be me?? Is
>> Gabby's soul felling a bit guilty over what..that is a real question..
>>
>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 4:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.
>>
>> Do you have false teeth by any chance Gabby?  If so, could you have a
>> second set made, then you could leave them in situ after biting his ass,
>> and save the rest of us from the thiedium?
>>
>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 2:05:11 PM UTC, Gabby wrote:
>>
>> Big girl - that's not my wording, not my style, not how I view myself.
>> It's true, I was trying to make a constructive suggestion to get us out
>> of your barking at us and twisting our words to draw the focus of attention
>> to
>>
>> ...
>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to