This depends on what know and what we are aware of. Those people who believe they have a clear knowledge will see them as inferior and yet be afraid of them. The equal party people will see as a sports challenge. Those of us who are aware that they don't stand on equal knowledge ground will use it with consideration, I hope.
2015-03-08 22:04 GMT+01:00 polly skid <[email protected]>: > I have a question.. If one day robots get some sort of moral autonomy.. > Will they have same rights as is... Seeing they will have a clear knowledge > of their creators unlike us... Will we ever consider them an equal party in > our imaginary contract?? > On Mar 9, 2015 1:28 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That is very true, >> >> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Molly <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 8:55 PM >> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards. >> >> Ultimately, whether a group "goes backwards" or forwards, succeeds or >> fails, depends on the membership. The quality of the dialogue has improved >> here lately with the return of a few members that were at one time >> interested in the quality of the conversation. Even when that quality was >> high, squabbles occurred and trolls came and went. It will be interesting >> to see what happens to the group, whether it slides back to viscous >> discourse or continues to improve. No behind the scenes covert >> manipulations will decide the fate. This group will fail or not because of >> what the members tolerate, respect, introduce, offer and create. No more no >> less. You can stack the administrators, change the engaged members. The >> tone and longevity of the dialogue is simply formulated by the daily words >> posted. No single person's manipulations (or select few that allow) will >> make or break it. Even if ME fails here, the members relate on more than >> one platform, and if the desire is to continue the conversation, whatever >> the tone, it will continue. Human resilience should never be underestimated. >> >> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 2:55:24 PM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote: >>> >>> Not me Francis is the proper group vicar. His knowledge and >>> understanding is so far beyond mine.. it is embarrassing. >>> >>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: archytas <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 7:41 PM >>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards. >>> >>> We have vicars not vacars my dear. *You were the Information Manager, >>> a far more important role given the needed suppression of the project for >>> reasons of international security. Does vicarious embarrassment need >>> batteries? You not laughing will be tough to get to the top of the >>> newspile. Though you are a giggle. Allan is well aware of his real role. >>> * >>> >>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 6:14:06 PM UTC, Gabby wrote: >>> >>> What about your "making" Allan your project manager of the moral >>> compass? Ich musste mich so fremdschämen! (It made me squirm with vacarious >>> embarrassment!) Did I tell Allan how he was made the circus clown while he >>> was thinking he was the director? No, i did not laugh. >>> >>> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb archytas : >>> >>> I hardly expect you to whisper sweet nothings, even as Gabbsie Twirly. >>> You could be less Bulldog sometimes and just let the sleeping dog lie, >>> though the other side of this is to become the nodding donkey Allan >>> supposedly does not like. Your high horse leaves a peculiar trail, given >>> rocking horse dung is so rare. Nice people usually aren't, so I always >>> think you might be. If you get my drift and understand I was genuinely >>> touched by you tagging me as the 'rabbit'. >>> >>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 4:16:48 PM UTC, Gabby wrote: >>> >>> Words can be seen as place holders if there is no meaning connected to >>> them. You insist your meaning is right, I insist my meaning is right, >>> doesn't lead us anywhere. That's why I made a suggestion you developed a >>> meaning repository of "soul" for us to be able to enter a meaningful >>> conversation with you instead of being confronted with what I perceive as >>> empty place holder interjections in an otherwise interesting thread >>> continuation. >>> >>> But you can twist, offend, insult, attack - fools and children are >>> always forgiven. My problem is that I take it serious what you are doing >>> and saying here. And I get my punishment. [ waving hello at RP :-) ] >>> >>> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015 schrieb : >>> >>> To me all " big girl " is saying is she is an adult and of female >>> gender.. nothing more.. unless may be grow up. No different some one >>> telling me I am a big boy.. >>> >>> But if i say the sun is shining Gabby is offended.. if she is offended i >>> will stop using it.. >>> >>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Molly <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 4:38 PM >>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards. >>> >>> Also, I have to go with Gabby on this one. Calling her a big girl is >>> gender insensitive and demeaning. >>> >>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:27:40 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote: >>> >>> I am trying to find out why our big girl Gabby is so bothered be me?? Is >>> Gabby's soul felling a bit guilty over what..that is a real question.. >>> >>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: archytas <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 4:16 PM >>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards. >>> >>> Do you have false teeth by any chance Gabby? If so, could you have a >>> second set made, then you could leave them in situ after biting his ass, >>> and save the rest of us from the thiedium? >>> >>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 2:05:11 PM UTC, Gabby wrote: >>> >>> Big girl - that's not my wording, not my style, not how I view myself. >>> It's true, I was trying to make a constructive suggestion to get us out >>> of your barking at us and twisting our words to draw the focus of attention >>> to >>> >>> ... >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/-5LTfst-rD0/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
