On 7/30/2010 05:59, Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Earnie<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> NightStrike wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Earnie<[email protected]>    
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NightStrike wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>    On a long term scale, it'd be nice to compile msys natively for
>>>>>    win64. That's a looooong way off, though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I have no way to even begin to try it.  First though one would need to
>>>> bootstrap GCC 64 bits with the MSYS runtime while at the same time
>>>> bootstrapping MSYS runtime into 64 bits.
>>>>
>>> I thought the first step was porting newlib.  Doesn't msys still use that?
>>>
>> Yes, it uses newlib and a mix of Windows API calls.  But newlib may
>> actually be the easier part to convert.
>>
>
> Earnie: where specifically is uname source code? I can take a look to
> Windows API and since I have a x64 OS can check different results and
> let you know.
>
> If I can add proper identification of x86_64 (based from the OS it is
> running) will make me feel better for making you guys waste all this
> time answering this thread.
>

Hi,

I think its a bad idea to jump to conclusions based on OS running. What 
if I wanted to run plain mingw.org GCC on win64?

IMHO, setting MSYSTEM would be a better approach.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to