On 7/30/2010 08:57, Luis Lavena wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM, JonY<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 7/30/2010 05:59, Luis Lavena wrote: >>> >>> Earnie: where specifically is uname source code? I can take a look to >>> Windows API and since I have a x64 OS can check different results and >>> let you know. >>> >>> If I can add proper identification of x86_64 (based from the OS it is >>> running) will make me feel better for making you guys waste all this >>> time answering this thread. >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I think its a bad idea to jump to conclusions based on OS running. > > I think get it identified is way better than 'unknown' >
IMHO, status quo is preferable than changing a "feature" that some software might depend on. >> What if I >> wanted to run plain mingw.org GCC on win64? >> >> IMHO, setting MSYSTEM would be a better approach. > > You mean force compilation to something that is not the native one? > --host will still be available. > No, I mean gcc.exe is a 32bit target gcc, from a mingw.org release. As far as the toolchain is concerned, running in WOW is native enough. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
