Hi,
Am 29.09.2017 um 15:39 schrieb Larry Hynes:
Markus Rosjat <ros...@ghweb.de> wrote:
my boss is getting on my nerves
It may be mutual.
of course but well :)
that greylisting is basically out of date because of things like
outlook.com and mails ending up delayed for ever. So the next logical
step would be to deploy a tool like rspamd or spamassasin to examin
mail content. These tools need to be trained and if you have a small
mailserver with less accounts this could take a while I imagine.
Specifically in relation to rspamd: If you spend some time reading
the documentation on the rspamd website you might find that:
1. the weight of rules which classify messages as 'ham' or 'spam'
i.e. those rules which rely on the 'training' of messages, does not
have to be, in the overall context, critical. rspamd deploys a
boatload of 'tests', by default, and even more can be enabled, and
each of those can be assigned a score. hamminess or spamminess is
just one 'test'.
2. That the rspamd website specifically links to 'pre-built' ham
and spam databases which you are free to download and use.
I'll check this out !
Thank you for the hint !!!
regards
--
Markus Rosjat fon: +49 351 8107223 mail: ros...@ghweb.de
G+H Webservice GbR Gorzolla, Herrmann
Königsbrücker Str. 70, 01099 Dresden
http://www.ghweb.de
fon: +49 351 8107220 fax: +49 351 8107227
Bitte prüfen Sie, ob diese Mail wirklich ausgedruckt werden muss! Before
you print it, think about your responsibility and commitment to the
ENVIRONMENT
