On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:57:53PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> Yes this is quite silly. Stallman insists on "free" software, and
> distributions are only acceptable if they shove that software down
> the users throats in the stead of something else, thus restricting
> the users freedom.
illegal logical conclusion: core dumped
Users can always install whatever they can, if it is compatible at all,
but a most extremely honourable distribution of software won't teach
users that non-free is ok by giving an example: not distributing it.
If they want to, it's only their choice.
Where is freedom restricted here?
> Besides, nobody is forcing you to install any of the ports.
Neither to use a 100% free software distribution, it's your prorrogative
to chose a slaver.
> Forced freedom, that's just a blatent contradiction.
Of course, logic teaches one thing... that from the absurd you can
deduce anything...
A ^ !A
-------------
ABS
> Have I summised it well? Can we let this one go now?
Nopes, you didn't. Yes, you in particular should let it go now.
> always going to be someone respected taking shots at you. Talking
> about it gets noting accomplished.
Neither does bullshitting about it.
Rui
--
Umlaut Zebra |ber alles!
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 52nd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
