On 12/10/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:57:53PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote: > > Yes this is quite silly. Stallman insists on "free" software, and > > distributions are only acceptable if they shove that software down > > the users throats in the stead of something else, thus restricting > > the users freedom. > > illegal logical conclusion: core dumped > > Users can always install whatever they can, if it is compatible at all, > but a most extremely honourable distribution of software won't teach > users that non-free is ok by giving an example: not distributing it.
Since when was propaganda honourable? > > always going to be someone respected taking shots at you. Talking > > about it gets noting accomplished. > > Neither does bullshitting about it. Exactly. -Nick
